 | | Re: **** MLCAD V2.00 is out now ****
|
|
(...) Menu "Extras/Reports/Pieces..." .... Greetings, Michael (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | camera angles
|
|
OK I'm a newbie to this and I've created my first .dat model. Ive converted it to a .pov using L3p and rendered it using POVRay. Question... How do I change the camera angle POVRay renders to something a bit more dramatic than the back of the model (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: **** MLCAD V2.00 is out now ****
|
|
one possible feature addation: show listing of all parts ( and how many of them ) used in a model. useful for ordering parts to make a real model! -- And they said 'Computers will never be in general use' "Michael Lachmann" (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: **** MLCAD V2.00 is out now ****
|
|
(...) MLCad V2.00 checks for customer created language DLL's during startup. In the next days I provide more information about that on the mlcad pages. There will be a description what and how to do new language dlls for MLCad. Michael (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | How to customise parts tree in MLCad V2.00R2
|
|
How to customise the parts tree: ===...=== From "Settings/Groups/Group configuration..." you can create your own groups or just add new ones. For every group you define rules which define what comes into this groups. Example: Add a group let say (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: **** MLCAD V2.00 is out now ****
|
|
(...) I'll post an article showing how to do it ... Michael (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: **** MLCAD V2.00 is out now ****
|
|
(...) Make sure you've downloaded the latest release V2.00R2 - this has a fix for that. V2.00 behaved like that descriped above. V2.00R2 works fine. Michael (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: July MOTM is ready to go!
|
|
(...) It's not just that. It was more of a fairness issue. Some people have sites with pictures up. Some don't. Some may not even have multiple images of what they entered to put on a site. So I thought it fairer if the voting was based just on the (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: July MOTM is ready to go!
|
|
Terry, Regarding the new rules, I like them, except for the part about not specifying a web address and not providing multiple views. All of my renderings would fit into the "model" category except for this. I like to provide a web link to multiple (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: July MOTM is ready to go!
|
|
Hi Shiri, If there is any thought of voting for mine, then vote for one of the others. I've already won twice. I just wanted to enter this to show off some more models. I don't really care about winning. There are plenty of really strong entries (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: WIP 6643 Techic Flex System Connector [DAT]
|
|
(...) That's normal behaviour. Since the edge primitives are only lines, they draw in color 24. Generally, in part files, you pass color 16 to them, and they draw the 'main' edge color. So if you have some code like: 1 16 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: **** MLCAD V2.00 is out now ****
|
|
(...) To easily pick out the temp (hidden?) files, click the column headings in Explorer to resort the list. In newer versions of Windows, you should have the option to display file attributes, making it very easy to sort the hidden files out from (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: **** MLCAD V2.00 is out now ****
|
|
(...) building models. For instance, if I wanted to create my own organization scheme for all the parts in the parts.lst. I actually use (and LOVE!) DATSort, but for sorting after the construction is complete. Make sense? Jake --- Jake McKee AFOL (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: **** MLCAD V2.00 is out now ****
|
|
(...) One questions for you, in the ReleaseNotes.txt file, you mention that one of the updates is the ability for user defined language DLLs with usability checks. What is that? Jake --- Jake McKee AFOL LUGNET Member #211 (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: **** MLCAD V2.00 is out now ****
|
|
(...) to (...) the (...) That's what Jeff Boen (Onyx) created DATSort for. (URL) can sort the pieces by position or color, in between steps or not, and you can even get it to sort mpd files. I use all the time and love it! --Ryan (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: **** MLCAD V2.00 is out now ****
|
|
(...) Clicking on it works, but on the command line from Windows 2000 you now have to very specific and include a path and the .exe extension. For example, this works: c:\mlcaddir\mlcad.exe myfile.dat But this gives the MLCAD.DLL error even if (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: **** MLCAD V2.00 is out now ****
|
|
(...) Michael, Looks great! I like the new changes! I haven't played with all the new stuff yet, but so far I love everything I see!! If I might offer a suggestion/request: I would *love* to see the ability to re-arrange the parts list so that the (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: July MOTM is ready to go!
|
|
(...) Such big decisions! Silly castle people, can't you take turns? The vote'll be split among you all! Who do I vote for? I'm torn, Brad's cathedral is cool but Tamy and Elin and the dragon... ugh!! -Shiri (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | July MOTM is ready to go!
|
|
Hey all, Time to vote. (URL) luck to the entrants. And notice that there is a link to an additional rules page. I've decided to try a split format. A model-only contest and a scene contest. The rules are spelled out on how and what to enter. (URL) (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM Parameters question
|
|
(...) Short answer: Yes A parts "unofficial" status should not be a hindrance to its use. Similar to the use of a "mock-up" part to fill in where no official piece yet exists. If it does the job in place of a part that is not yet available, use it. (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
