|
|
 | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
| "Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GE0K6s.Ew@lugnet.com... (...) For an LDraw.org run contest, I would restrict entries to models which have been generated with DAT utilities. (...) I wouldn't restrict model entries to bare (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
| (...) But what would be an allowable entry in 'LDRAWn'? A bmp. output of the actual original LDraw? Or include outputs or screenshots of LDLite, MLCad, LDView, BlockCAD, and others? Perhaps restrict model entries to a basic rendered output available (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: June 2001 MOTM contest
|
| "Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet news:GDyo23.666@lugnet.com... (...) rendered. I mean, there are many modelers that maybe haven't mastered POVRay (or other renderers) yet, but might still have good models. MOTM is more and more (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: *.lca to *.dat?
|
| "Tore Eriksson" <tore.eriksson@mbox3...wipnet.se> skrev i meddelandet news:3B109B1F.725658...pnet.se... (...) How far did you get? Anything to share, I might give it a shot - it's just the kind of challenge I like (Yes, there are weird people in the (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: *.lca to *.dat?
|
| I tried to analyze a .lca on its binary stuff, but I gave up. It's just too complicted, and possibly compressed. It could work if TLC handed us the specifications for the file format, but why should they do that? LEGO Creator is, after all, a (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | *.lca to *.dat?
|
| Hi. Is there any way to turn LEGO Creator files (.lca) into .dat files or vise-versa? If so, i might try to import the battle driod into the program and see if lets me, but i have no way to convert the files. (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | June 2001 MOTM contest
|
| That time again, A very interesting mix of entries. Vote now through the end of the month... (URL) Terry K -- (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !
| | | | | Re: Me again
|
| 2. Yes, I downloaded it and it looks promising. (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
| I agree with Jon Palmer. Since he failed to put the desired newsgroup in FUT section, I've taken the liberty of doing it for him. This should apply to all discussions caused by soc's original post that obviously have gone off-topic. Travis Dickinson (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
| | | | | Re: Me again
|
| (...) Hmm... What is Opera 5.11? I use IE 5.5 so I guess I'm out of luck there, anyway. (...) I've tried several times, but it won't download for me. Is this also an IE 5.5 issue perhaps? Still interested in your movie, Dirtman (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Me again
|
| I just wanted to check opera 5.11 on lugnet and tell two things. 1 Opera works well in lugnet GREAT for me bad for IE 5.5 ! 2 Has anyone else downloaded my animation? Eduardo (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
| (...) <this is the REAL SOC speaking> YES!! By all means yes!! But one question - and this goes out to everybody that has asked this question... If you want it out of a group, FIX THE FOLLOW UP!!! You failed to do this, as well has most of the (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
| | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
| (...) Finally! The voice of reason! Thank you, Paul, for saying what many of us are thinking! Some additional comments, though: If someone gets their feelings hurt on lugnet, why must they subject ALL of us to their anger? I know when <I> read (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
| | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
| Guys is it possible we could keep this discussion in off-topic.debate? -Jon "soc" <reallysick_of_crap@...tmail.com> wrote in message news:GDx9Jo.IDB@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) posts, (...) each (...) clarify? (...) about (...) proxy (...) I'll (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
| Ok, it's time for me to step in... who am I? just a father who has heard a few to many unnecessary words. It takes at least two people to argue. If no one else will reply to this type of postings, they will quit. If someone wants to flame someone, (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
| | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
| (...) Desperation?! Ok for the English impaired: Even if your account is reinsated no one will forgive your transgressions. Bottom line is children are a large portion of Lugnet participants and common social decency is expected here. This is NOT a (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
|
| (...) You don't get it do you. You have not only violated Lugnet's TOS but also US Fedral law. (regardless of the fact it is not enforceable.) But first and for most you have violated the basic decency and trust of the comunity. You can never join (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
|
|
