 | | Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
|
(...) Hmmm. Maybe you're right, for the short term. But putting Unofficial on the front of the name makes it clear for everyone. Most people wouldn't know what the @-sign means. Long-term, I want to use this 'unofficial release' page as (at least) a (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
|
I like my @-sign better. It only takes one character, and it puts them first in the parts list (if sorted by description, of course). I recall that someone used another character, but which one is not important. Just my 50-öring. /Tore (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:dm3gftcj64fh7m1...4ax.com... (...) Those (...) OK, that's great. I thought I'd bring it up just in case there was a problem with code somewhere. At least this update will make it very (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
|
(...) It was a direct suggestion to mark the parts all as unofficial, to make it easier to remove them later (after another official release). (...) That falls under the category of 'no review of the parts before release'. Those parts already had (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:92sfftk3sqrfi3d...4ax.com... (...) name - (...) to (...) 'Unofficial' to (...) I thought it might be something like that. (...) keep a (...) The Unofficial is going to make it hard to find (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
