| | Re: I've been published!
|
|
Oops, I knew that. Sorry John! Someone has been letting my hands type without supervision again... -gyug (24 years ago, 5-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: I've been published!
|
|
Yes, I'll add that as an option. -gyug (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: Where, oh where, can I get a part number for a patterned piece?
|
|
(...) claimed (...) Thanks for the suggestion. I'll do that. -- James J. (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Proposal
|
|
"Matthew Gerber" <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message news:GCtx8C.8C3@lugnet.com... (...) Cool. I'd prefer the primary file extension to reflect the 'LDraw' name - 'ldr.' Some further discussion may be in order about DAT files having more than (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: I've been published!
|
|
(...) I think you misunderstood! John VanZwieten composed the images for the book. I don't think I would have had the patience to render all those images. Even if they were images of my own creations. I think the images are really great. It's (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: Proposal
|
|
Sorry it took so long for me to get this back. I scoured my sources and all of the Internet databases I know of, and as far as I can tell, you are free and clear on all of these extensions: .ldr .ldl .lds .mpd .mlc I wonder if someone didn't do this (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: I've been published!
|
|
(...) Sounds awesome! Will 2.1 autocrop the image to the rendered scene? The loss of this feature in LDLite 2.0 is the reason I still use v1.6... Steve (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: I've been published!
|
|
Fredrik, I just ordered your book. Are there really a few part images produced with LDLite? That's so cool! :) The soon-to-be-released 2.1 version of LDLite now lets you set widths greater than 3, and draws both the type 1 and type 5 lines in the (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Shortcuts (was: Unofficial Update Progress)
|
|
(...) Instead of the pattern file naming style, use the shortcut/composite part naming style - use a C instead of a P. Also, since the torso is the central part of the shortcut, use 973 as the base number. Likewise, use the pattern number as the (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Optional lines ... brain ache!
|
|
Ignore me, I'm an idiot, I didn't notice the difference in the 2 pictures. It sort of makes sense now. Dan (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|