 | | Real monolith
|
|
Surely by now, you've seen this? (URL) J. Sayatovic mailto:trin@1.net (replace '1' with 'one') "Marc Atkin" <atkin@cs.umass.edu> wrote in message news:G6HEGD.8M2@lugnet.com... (...) Lego (...) and (...) it's (...) movie, (...) did (...) minute (...) (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.animation, lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.build, lugnet.space, lugnet.town, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: "2001: A Lego Odyssey" - A New Lego Movie!
|
|
Impressive! Royce (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.animation, lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.build, lugnet.space, lugnet.town, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: 4.5 Volt straight track (p/n 3228), different versions ?
|
|
(...) Thanks for the reminder... I *always* forget that. (...) Which you forgot to do! <zing> :-) ++Lar (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | New Part: Brick 1 x 2 with 2 Pins [DAT]
|
|
I needed this for the 7166 Imperial Shuttle. I just took the 2458 piece and duplicated the pins. (If this is a duel post I appologize, I didn't think it took. 0 Brick 1 x 2 with 2 Pins 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 "Custom" 0 ROTATION CONFIG 0 1 1 16 0 (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: "2001: A Lego Odyssey" - A New Lego Movie!
|
|
I don't mean to assume, but I'm interested in how you did this. Judging by the QT format is it safe to say you used some type of digital video camera (like the every day Hi8 / Digital8 Cameras) and transferred it over firewire to something like (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.animation, lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.build, lugnet.space, lugnet.town, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | ew Part: 33080.dat Scala Baseplate 22 x 44 [DAT]
|
|
0 Scala Baseplate 22 x 44 0 Name: 33080.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Un-Official Part 2 24 -436 0 220 436 0 220 2 24 -436 8 220 436 8 220 4 16 -436 0 220 -436 8 220 436 8 220 436 0 220 2 24 -436 0 -220 436 0 -220 2 24 -436 8 -220 436 8 -220 4 16 (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Duplo parts?
|
|
[this should go to either lugnet.cad.dat.parts...rimitives, or lugnet.cad.dev, but tight is the grip of inertia...] (...) That seems a bit thin for the walls. I'll dig out some DUPLO bricks, and look at them more closely. (...) Hmm. That's a height (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Duplo parts?
|
|
(...) As you noted, the logo should not be included (in LDraw). (...) So far, the flattened corners have been skipped on System-scale parts. Do the flattened corners deviate from a true circle by more than 1 LDU? If they do, then that adds weight to (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: Brick 2 x 2 with 2 Pins [DAT]
|
|
I found this part is required for the 7166 Imperial Shuttle. I just copied the 2458 and duplicated the pin. I named it 2459. If that is incorrect, let me know. I have no idea how this numbering system works. Joe 0 Brick 1 x 2 with 2 Pins 0 ROTATION (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Duplo parts?
|
|
(...) Skip this. (...) Skip this as well. POV-Ray versions may include it. Steve (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 3960p01.dat - Space Radar Dish 4 x 4 with Red/Green Petals pattern
|
|
Pushing my posting-count up another notch, I forgot to hit this one point, so I'm making another reply... (...) 'Functional' or 'descriptive'? 'Brick' isn't a functional label, except indirectly. Anyway, the categories should fall along the lines of (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 3960p01.dat - Space Radar Dish 4 x 4 with Red/Green Petals pattern
|
|
(...) Right. Except that I seriously think Train should stay. There are many parts which are fairly Train-specific. But there are number of current Train parts that should be moved into other areas. (...) Right. But there are more pressing issues, (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 3960p01.dat, "CYLINDER??? Radar Dish 4 x 4 - Red/Green Petals"
|
|
(...) For now, leave out the 0 CATEGORY metastatement. AFAIK, all programs which look for 0 CATEGORY will grab the first word in the part title as the default category. Steve (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: HELP ME~!!!!!
|
|
(...) After you downloaded the runtime patch, did you also install/apply it? The runtime patch actually modifies the ldraw.exe and ledit.exe files in c:\ldraw\. Also, have you considered going with MLCAD or LeoCad? With those two programs, you don't (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Line Thickness and Antialiasing in LdGLite 0.7.3
|
|
Very cool! I noticed two things, which could be considered problems. One is straight-forward, the other is not so. The first thing is that using the -ms commandline option doesn't save any images if there are no 0 STEP commands in the file. I was (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: missing lego-cad primitive: 1-4ring5.dat (modified - POV)
|
|
(...) By the way, do you intend to make your sources available? Maybe event on sourceforge? Then, I could send patches to you instead of pestering you with my pleas for additions ;-) Regards, Hakan (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: missing lego-cad primitive: 1-4ring5.dat (modified - POV)
|
|
(...) Thanks a lot ;-) Expect me to fulfill expectations ;-) (...) I see. Thanks for keeping me informed. (...) It depends. Generally, I just throw the part after the floor definition (inclusive) away, and then add my own floor, background, camera (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Requests
|
|
WOW! Thanks a lot Steve. I also agree with you about the cylinder category. When I sort my LEGO, I have sort all the round plates and round bricks into one section. (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Line Thickness and Antialiasing in LdGLite 0.7.3
|
|
(...) I understand the problems related to this. It is not a major issue with me, as I will use LdGLite (is the the correct capitalization?) mostly for explorative viewing of a complete model, not for step-by-step viewing. It may be a problem when (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Requests
|
|
Steve, Shouldn't this be (re)oriented, so that it's in the X>0&Z>0 quadrant? You did the plate that way. Franklin (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
