 | | LDLite Question
|
|
I think this is the correct group for this question, if not, please direct me appropriately. Can anyone help me understand the arguments to LDLite's "-A" switch. I want to view my model upside down, so essentially I want to rorate it 180 degrees (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
|
(...) As a somewhat innocent bystander, I'd like to see it stay LDraw.org, which is why I used the LDraw family of applications to refer to programs which will ultimately derrive from the work James started. (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: License - again
|
|
(...) Tim will have to correct us, but I believe that James's family has given Tim permission to continue publishing James's work. This is probably something which should be properly ironed out with the Jessiman's. They will have to decide to what (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
|
[snipped .cad.dev from ng list] (...) I very much agree with this. It doesn't matter if it's a physical split, or a simple matter of presentation. As long as normal people don't have to wade through the geek-gunk. (...) I want to do away with (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on new Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) Yes, the outstanding items will *definitely* be loaded into the system, one way or another. Steve (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Upgrading to Windows 2000 Professional
|
|
Any Win32 based software package should function great. IE ML-Cad. However LDraw most likely will not run due to the DOS mode that will make direct hardware calls. I'm currently running Windows 2000 on another computer and was playing with ML-Cad on (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization
|
|
(...) Right. But if something new and plainly better (in all aspects) comes along, we can as easily label it "LDraw Mk II" as any other name. Assuming the author(s) would go along willingly, of course. :) Steve (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
|
(...) And I'd still be happy to include the results of that effort under the LDraw umbrella. I think Jacob still has documents on his server about "LDraw II". But we don't need to write a new format -- it's already there. Heck, there are a bunch of (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Upgrading to Windows 2000 Professional
|
|
"Heather Patey" <hpatey@nfld.com> wrote in message news:G5ttBJ.EDA@lugnet.com... (...) be (...) I've already made the move. As far as I can tell, everything works except the original LEdit, becuase win2k doesn't like DOS applications. You can still (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Upgrading to Windows 2000 Professional
|
|
I'm about to upgrade my operating system from Win95 to Win2K. Has anyone done this yet, and are there issues with the common LCAD software that I ought to be aware of? Wouldn't want to be stuck without my virtual bricks. Thanks, Heather -- Heather (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
