 | | Re: Parts license
|
|
(...) It was a bad idea, please ignore that paragraph. (...) Ok, any lawyers around ? Anyone wants to write a license with all of that fancy legal stuff ? (...) The important thing for the parts is to keep them free to use and people who improve the (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another Part name and number wanted ;-)
|
|
(...) That's a good point. I think the name above sounds like a good idea. Fredrik (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: A project suggestion= Let's develop a Theme ourselves....
|
|
(...) top (...) at (...) There (...) Meant to be view from the bottom and I admit it's not very good! I am at present working on a differnet idea regarding pillar suppourts. L-CADing in progress. (...) be (...) ITSOIDKS (I Think so , I don't know (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work
|
|
"Thomas Burger" <Tburger666@aol.com> wrote in message news:G13G5x.3yn@lugnet.com... (...) The reason I didn't publish it was because I was waiting for it to be corrected gramatically. Since I'm not a parts author, I wouldn't be comfortable doing it (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work
|
|
(...) yes it is a false link , tim never published the stuff i sent him (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | I'm completely bored need ideas
|
|
I don't know want to do with my mlcad models, I don't now if is possible to do any type of animation (no gif or avi)or interactive thing 3d type need to know want can I do with my model. (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Monorail Track
|
|
(...) I'm really glad someone is going after the monorail track pieces. -Chuck (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts license
|
|
(...) What Todd (and I) were commenting on was this (optional) provision: (...) Which is different from your statement above, and would block TLC from using the parts unless their program was free. Before finalizing the licenses, it would be (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another Part name and number wanted ;-)
|
|
(...) Oops. Julie Krenz sent me an e-mail, pointing out that there are other plant pieces which can be described as "brick 1x1 with 3 leaves". So having some indication of the type of piece and/or leaves, beyond the term 'side', would be good. So (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts license
|
|
(...) TLC won't use our parts directly (interfacing maybe) but even if they want to, they can use the parts as long as they use the unmodified version or publish their changes under our license. Here's a link with several software licenses: (URL) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 30473 (Baseplate 32 x 32 Canyon Plate Without Island)
|
|
(...) Hi Heather. I replied Saturday morning but it appears the message got lost. Good work on your first piece. I can see nothing wrong with it, but I am not an expert on the subject. Keep working on different pieces and your confidence and skill (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: A project suggestion= Let's develop a Theme ourselves....
|
|
(...) The (...) I'm confused as to whether this is a top view or side view. (...) You're right, 3 high is the correct height to make them. That, or a multiple thereof, is the step height on most (all?) of the raised baseplates. Interlocking will (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Pictures of my MLCad MOCs
|
|
(...) I have POV-Ray and L3P but I'm still a bit confused about it. I have used L3P with a bit of success but I couldn't really figure out the coordinate system (I really didn't try that much though) and I'm not real fond of DOS commands. I was (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.town, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts license
|
|
(...) I'd definitely be somewhat concerned about a license which restricted the parts from being used with non-free programs. I'd hate to preclude the possibility of a really awesome commercial program being forced to re-invent the wheel, and (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts license
|
|
(...) One thing I forgot to add -- In the spirit of open content, I think that any license that comes about ought to at least require that the republisher of the data must give a link to www.ldraw.org so that anyone using the parts or any (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Could someone help me with this?
|
|
Jay Cal wrote... (...) You must use the -l option of L3P, eg. "l3p -l mymodel" See also the -ld option. Read about the options in l3p.txt (comes with l3p.exe) /Lars (24 years ago, 17-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts license
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G11svz.4IH@lugnet.com... (...) using (...) Something to be considered. I could give the Jessimans' an email soon (I haven't heard from them in a while) and ask them about the parts that James (...) (24 years ago, 17-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Raytracing with Lightwave now possible!!! How? See...
|
|
Hello, a new converter exists since a few days. It can convert LDraw Objects (*.DAT) into Lightwave Objects (*.lwo) and Lightwave Scene Files (*.lws) (compatible with Version 5.5, 5.6, 6.x); running under Win 95 / 98 / NT / 2000. It is completly (...) (24 years ago, 17-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: A project suggestion= Let's develop a Theme ourselves....
|
|
I made an elevated platform that has 2 space landing plates on top of a brick frame work. I set the plates right on the studs though. This makes the baseplates perfectly even with normal plates around the baseplates. Maybe I should take a picture. (...) (24 years ago, 17-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts license
|
|
(...) Sounds interesting. I would rather see it under something like Perl's Artistic License than GPL, though. How do you define "programs"? And the license should be careful not to preclude the possibility of LEGO using or interfacing with the (...) (24 years ago, 17-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
