 | | Syntax error in official part 754.dat?
|
|
Hi, I just noticed that L3Lab interpreted the following lines as real lines, not as comments: 01 16 0 -2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ring3.dat 01 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ring3.dat I sent a mail to Lars to notify him of this small "bug", but then it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
|
|
(...) errors. (...) common (...) these (...) let (...) Having now looked in more detail at the torsos, I will probably modify this proposal. On the torsos the _shield_ is a very different shape and scale to the shield part. The actual wolf and black (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) You can use LeoCAD to do that, just type: leocad file.dat -i image.png -w [width] -h [height] Leonardo (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) It should be able to do that. You want to do this automatically from the command line, right? Did you compile in the png support? I'm not great at makefiles so makefile.linux has multiple targets. I usually build the l3glitepng target with (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) Follow-up: What I'm trying to do is generate "ldraw" rendered images directly to a file. This is an attempt to speed up the rendering process in the Virtual Explorer. The quality will be less, but hopefully it will be more interactive. I still (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Printing from MLCad
|
|
Hi all, How can I print only and only the model? Without it's (file) name, title and stuff at the top and bottom "page x of x"...? -- Greetingz... Sjaacko (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: what is legos official view of ldraw?
|
|
(...) I get ya. It is ok to make any lego part untill or unless TLG says otherwise. (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) Will mlcad run under wine? ldao? (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: L3Lab is so awesome!
|
|
Lars C. Hassing <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:Ft8ruG.Bt3@lugnet.com... (...) Believe it or not, I checked it before writing that post. I must have some seriously mis-oriented synapse pattern somewhere :-) (...) Agreed. (...) How (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Updated version of official part 756.dat
|
|
Looks good to me. -John Van Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote in message news:qrdr9c2ffcy.fsf....uio.no... (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: the parts 754.dat and 756.dat in the 8.5L hose
|
|
(...) Thanks for clearing that up! In that case, I'll submit the 756.dat I just posted to lugnet.cad.dat.parts to Steve Bliss. Since it is an improvement of an existing part, it shouldn't require a vote, right? Fredrik (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: the parts 754.dat and 756.dat in the 8.5L hose
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote in message news:qrd7lduwl4w.fsf....uio.no... (...) I updated the 754.dat to make it more realistic, but obviously failed to do so for 756. Feel free to improve the 756.dat! -John Van (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) In my experience, L3Lab works almost perfectly with Wine under GNU/Linux. LDLITE, on the other hand, works just barely under Wine, and I've never managed to run LDraw at all under neither Wine nor DOSEMU. I would really like to run LEdit under (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) I tried to play a little with l3lab running under wine, and it seems to run, but I didn't have time to play with it more... :) Dan (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) Kevin - email it to me? ;) Dan (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Updated version of official part 756.dat [DAT]
|
|
Here is my suggestion for an update of the part 756.dat. See my post (URL) a background story on why I think it should be updated. You may worry that this part, having more rounded shapes and more polygons, will make the rendering of a hose more CPU (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: what is legos official view of ldraw?
|
|
(...) AFAIK, TLG hasn't said anything officially regarding LDraw or its parts libraries. I believe LDraw as a freeware program is well within its rights to contain SW elements as well. They aren't making official statements about it (IMO) because (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) I meant to say "no point _for_me_ to discuss anymore". Sorry for sounding harsh. (...) I still don't agree. But as I said (or rather meant to say, English isn't my primary language, so I sometimes goof) we probably don't need to discuss this (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) I only used eight, to simplify the drawing, which was made by hand. (...) All I say is that the benefits from it overweight the extra effort. (...) Correct, Can't argue with that ! But this problem surfaces, due to the intrinsic polygonized (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with 1-4con1.dat
|
|
(...) I am using the color definitions from Anton's Lego library and these are the closest to real Lego colors i have seen. The only exception is black and transparent black that should be <0.2,0.2,0.2> Georg (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
