 | | Re: Another space render...
|
|
(...) Your ship also resembles my vision of a "'thopter" from Frank Herbert's Dune series... Very cool....I wonder if I have the parts to build one?.... hmmmm (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.publish, lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 30377.dat Battle Droid Arm
|
|
(...) My mistake. Try minifig droid astromech. (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 30377.dat Battle Droid Arm
|
|
(...) Great! I've found this part to be the most useful Battel Droid part, as it can be used as an "adapter" in the clip system. Say you want to connect a pole/antenna/whatever parallell to another; just use two Battle Droid arms! They do the job (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Another space render...
|
|
(...) (sorry to reply to myself: I just saw this question had come up in the one reply I hadn't read yet. Figures! ;) ) LFB (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.publish, lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Another space render...
|
|
(...) Wow, Bram. That ship is magnificent (but by now we expect nothing less from you!)--and the wing mount is very inventive; I like it a lot. A couple questions: does the geometry really work that conveniently in the "real built world," and do (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.publish, lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) It would probably be good enough to keep the "tip" in one, non-bendable part. Sure, I can think of situations where one would put only the outer part of the tip into something, causing the other part to bend. But that would probably be quite (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Easy part to model request
|
|
(...) Looks good to me! I think the part is correct. (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 30377.dat Battle Droid Arm
|
|
(...) I'm not positive, but I think the R2-D2 may be part of a larger class of Astromech droids. (Not all R2 units have hemispherical heads like R2-D2.) C-3PO (and TC-14) are Protocol Droids, IIRC. [crossposted to .starwars for verification :-] (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Another space render...
|
|
(...) I have Photoshop on a CD that I lost :/ I used Corel PhotoPaint, which has all the same features as Photoshop, to play with the lens flare (not only can I choose the brightness, I can also choose the lens type!)[1]. Right now I'm rendering the (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.publish, lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Another space render...
|
|
(...) Do you have Photoshop? You can place a lens flare anywhere and also adjust the brightness. If you don't, you could email me a pic and I could drop one on it for you. ~Mark (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.publish, lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) here's one solution: linetype 6 can be used multiple times in a row, with the x, y, and z set to where the curve must pass through, and the orientation to what the tube must look like in that position. hey, it *MIGHT* work. another, MUCH (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 30377.dat Battle Droid Arm
|
|
(...) Good idea. Then r2 can go in as minifig droid R2 unit & say 3p0s head can go in under minifig droid 3po head. (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Another space render...
|
|
(...) Hey, I like that name! I just might call it that. Thanks! (...) I have built it. It does work :) (...) Yeah, I played with a lens flare glare off of the canopy, but it didn't look great. I'm afraid if I place a sun in the picture, the lighting (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.publish, lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 30377.dat Battle Droid Arm
|
|
Jeff Stembel <aulddragon@wamalug.org> wrote in message news:Fsz2F8.Hpw@lugnet.com... (...) Hmmm. That's along the lines of what I was looking for. But now that I think about it, all the battle droid parts should probably be together in the minifig (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01 [DAT]
|
|
(...) I could redo the part, slicing it into sections that are 4LDU long. To properly package, this, each distinct/unique section should be made into a subpart file, and the main part files would be a list of these subparts. Taking this approach, (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) No hassle felt on my end--I feel stupid that I went to all the work of figuring out the angles, and then didn't document them. (...) Good point. We should definitely try harder to document part-usage. (...) Now that you mention the complete (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 30377.dat Battle Droid Arm
|
|
(...) What about "Double-Ended, Angled Clip"? :) Jeff (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 30377.dat Battle Droid Arm [DAT]
|
|
I'd love to have other suggestions for naming this thing. 0 FILE 30377.dat 0 MPD Author: John VanZwieten 0 0 This .MPD was compiled using M-Peedy 0 (URL) Battle droid arm 0 Name: 30377.dat 0 Author: John VanZwieten 0 Unofficial Element 0 Angle from (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
Rui Martins <Rui.Martins@link.pt> wrote in message news:Pine.GSU.4.10.1...0@is-sv... (...) solution, (...) which (...) their (...) No argument here. (...) are (...) But the amount of superpositioning is generally small compared to the overall size (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
