 | | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) Well I have to congratulate you for the effort ! Has always, when asked to, you provide some nice output! ;) So now let's discuss it. Just reply to my previous replys to "LITS 2" mails. I have to say, that I'don't actually have time know to (...) (25 years ago, 3-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) I believe that the only problem is that these matrixes can't be inverted ! I'not sure if placing a one on the specific place has exactly the same graphic behaviour ? can someone confirm ? (...) Use my proposal: 0 CERTIFY BFC MTX where MTX is (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) I have to read this better to make an opinion, later ! (...) Now you don't like local clipping anymore ? too or tree mails before you were in favour or am I mistaken ? I should we make complicated spec for clipping, just because of one stupid (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: My first part: 2x8 tile
|
|
That's a good start. Do you know its part number? (...) Should be: 0 Tile 2 x 8 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
I read the current proposal, and I have this to say: I don't agree with the following paragraph when an entire branch has to have cliping on to be able to be culled, don't think so. ( I know about the invert case, solution required ) 4 Control of (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) I agree with the default from the start, I proposed them, somewhere ! (...) Agreed! but that's NOT currently written that way, is it ? (...) NO it is NOT ! read on. (...) I know that the branch only would be required, but I don't agree with (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | My first part: 2x8 tile [DAT]
|
|
Well, it was easy to make this. Alan 0 Plate 2 x 8 1 16 60 4 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 40 4 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 -20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Influencing what parts people work on
|
|
As you know, The Guild of Bricksmiths, (URL) a big user of LDraw compatible tools, since Guild members are producing instructions for almost all of their kits. From time to time a Guildsman runs into a part he or she would really like to use in a (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev) !
|
| |
| | Re: NEW PART: Cylinder 2 x 2 x 2/3 Inverted Dome [DAT]
|
|
Try this: 0 Cylinder 2 x 2 x 2/3 Inverted Dome 0 Name: x???.dat 0 Author: Kevin M Bane 4/02/2000 0 Un-Official Part 1 16 0 -4.5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4-4edge.dat 1 16 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 -4.5 0 0 0 6 4-4cyli.dat 1 16 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4-4edge.dat 2 24 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW PART: Cylinder 2 x 2 x 2/3 Inverted Dome [DAT]
|
|
Kevin B <kevinb01@netfocus.net> wrote in message news:FsEux1.Lp7@lugnet.com... (...) Well, I for one have a BIG problem with it! Looks like the ole "WordWrap" monster got me! Sorry folks! Let's try that one again! Kevin B 0 Cylinder 2 x 2 x 2/3 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | NEW PART: Cylinder 2 x 2 x 2/3 Inverted Dome [DAT]
|
|
Well, I finally decided that the Palm Tree Trunk just made my Blue Fury look a little wierd, so I churned out this part this morning. Let me know if you have any problems or comments Kevin B 0 Cylinder 2 x 2 x 2/3 Inverted Dome 0 Name: x???.dat 0 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) I think the discussion started before the "line in The Sand" thread ! (...) It seems that it is currently on version 9 ! isn't it ?, but file name was NOT changed, OK. (...) Well, if my memory doesn't fail me, I taught you were against local (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: More LDRAW renderings
|
|
(...) Thanks for the advise. I noticed the command Halo in your code. Halo is not supported in PovRay 3.1. Instead i have to experiment with the Media command. George (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: More LDRAW renderings
|
|
GeoMan skrev i meddelandet ... (...) You can see my water at (URL) for POVRay version 3.0 - might need '#version 3.0' to silence some error messages in 3.1, I haven't tested...) It consists of two parts - first a plane with ripples: -8<---...--- (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Time for BFC overhaul?
|
|
(...) Didn't answer the question, but moving on. (...) That's good to know. (...) Yes, but the proposed standard doesn't list the several options for a specific issue thta asn't been agreed iet. List the options, that's my point, because if you (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Brick 1 x 3 with Control Panel Pattern
|
|
(...) No. From the standard file, you need to "cut out" the surface(s) where the pattern will be. If you don't, the results will be unpredictable. /Tore (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: PART 20283.dat Slope Brick 45 4 x 6 Double Inverted [DAT]
|
|
Yes, you're absolutely correct. How sloppy of me. :-/ (...) Here's the file with your correction: 0 @Slope Brick 45 4 x 6 Double Inverted 0 Name: 20283.dat 0 Author: James Jessiman (4854.dat) 0 Author: Modified into 20283.dat by Tore Eriksson 0 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Brick 1 x 3 with Control Panel Pattern
|
|
It's the first time i open a part with a pattern. Great work But, is it possible to re-use a standard 3622, and add only the pattern ? -- Damien et Nathalie Duquennoy 26, rue du belvédère 69210 L'ARBRESLE dduquenn@club-internet.fr (URL) Dee (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: beginnings of a walled town--definitely not a small file
|
|
Wow, good start for a project... Damien -- Damien et Nathalie Duquennoy 26, rue du belvédère 69210 L'ARBRESLE dduquenn@club-internet.fr (URL) Sauls <barbcue@nospam.home.com> a écrit dans le message : FsDKup.F1o@lugnet.com... (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: PART 20283.dat Slope Brick 45 4 x 6 Double Inverted [DAT]
|
|
(...) There is a mistake in the latest file. (No, it's not the wrong piece this time) look at the bottom of the part in l3lab and you'll see it. I believe that the line 4 16 40 24 40 40 4 40 -40 4 60 -40 24 40 should be written as v 4 16 40 24 40 40 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
