 | | Re: Parts Cataloging Program
|
|
(...) Is there some other way to compress JPG files, besides lowering the quality? Whenever I save a JPG file with 100% accuracy, the saved file is huge (ie, about the same size as a similar BMP file). (...) I've never heard of any kind of (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Throwbot foot
|
|
(...) Marc, Fredrik's post prompted me to look more closely at this part. I noticed that there are references to any of the axle primitives. Is there a reason you did not use any of these primitive files in your file? Steve (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
(...) I was planning on making mine about 8 studs wide. I think that I can do it, even though I wasn't so sure earlier, but you reinspired me. I have been able to create doors that fold up, and don't look to bad, and wheels that fold down. (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
|
Leonardo Zide <leonardo@centroin.com.br> wrote in message news:38DFDCB4.594866....com.br... (...) So what test do you run to determine what studs get removed? -John Van (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Throwbot foot
|
|
To me, the axle sticking out from the centre of the foot appears to have a little bit too thin cross sections. This observation is only based on viewing the part in L3Lab, so it may be wrong. What do you think? Other than that, it looks good! (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 32165 Technic Throwbot Head
|
|
Wow! What a part! Great work! If there is one thing I can nitpick about, it would be the lower "partial" axle hole. The real part has two small "nibs" on the lower portion, which are used to hold an axle in place. You can hear a "click" sound if (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6641.dat Technic Changeover Catch
|
|
This part certainly looks very good! I'm a bit unsure about it's orientation, though. Perhaps it could benefit from having the same orientation and origin as "32039 Technic Connector with Axlehole" and "3651 Technic Connector"? The part does have (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6539.dat Technic Driving Ring
|
|
The part does not appear to have the "clip" detail which is seen in the centre of the real part. But the part still looks great, so I would definitively vote for it in the LCAD update. Great work! I also agree with your choice of orientation. (I (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 6539.dat Technic Driving Ring [DAT]
|
|
0 Technic Driving Ring 0 Name: 6539.dat 0 Author: Marc Klein 0 Created with stl2dat conversion tool 0 Un-Official LCad part 1 16 0 0 9 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 -4 0 4-4cyli.dat 1 16 0 0 9 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 -1 0 4-4edge.dat 1 16 0 0 5 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 -1 0 (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
|
(...) I have done something like that for LeoCAD, it removes the studs above and below the bricks and plates for the rendering. I haven't added this option for the POV-Ray export but that's something that I can do if you want. Leonardo (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
