To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.mechaOpen lugnet.build.mecha in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Mecha / 11911
11910  |  11912
Subject: 
Re: New MOC:
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.mecha
Date: 
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 04:57:48 GMT
Viewed: 
695 times
  
In lugnet.build.mecha, Lindsay Frederick Braun wrote:
   In lugnet.build.mecha, Mladen Pejic wrote:
   In lugnet.build.mecha, Mark Neumann wrote:
   Compared to the legs the body core (not the wings) is plain, almost too plain. Not boxy, just flat when compared to the depth and texture of the legs.

As usual, you’re right on the mark, MARK! ;-)

The thing is, as much as I love SNOT, I don’t use it for everything, especially when building something as simple a wall. Guess I should have used it more though, to give the siding not just more texture, but more shape and as you say create “depth”.


Holy! Another post by LFB, this must be my lucky day! And it’s a riposte, defending moi!

   See, I can’t agree. I love SNOT too (I can never get over the urge to go “ew” to that) but the military plain-ness really helps in this case. It gives the platform a sense of “edifice” or “fortification”; add that to the curvature at the nose and you’ve got the mental image of a walking castle-cum-siege-machine.

Yeah, in some ways, the lines of long grey bricks, and long grey slopes can evoke bare concrete, as seen on the exterior of WWII bunkers, especially.

Here’s what’s floating around my head:

Cloche

Casemate

Coastal Artillery Observation (I presume)

MG embrasure

Fortress Third Reich by Kaufmann & Kaufmann, 2003, really opened up my eyes to bunker architecture.

  
Sometimes, it’s better (and more daring) to be plain, because it often works and highlights even more the areas that are cleverly constructed or detailed. I believe this is one of those times.

Thanks LFB!

  
But then, I’m Just Some Internet Guy™, so what do I know?

A lot. Just witness the wonder that is the “Takao”. :-)

Mladen Pejic

  
best

LFB

PS: I agree, the rising cockpit seat is fantastic. Can you install a shock in there, so you can eject the pilot? ;)

You could, but you would have to make it deeper. Good idea though.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New MOC:
 
(...) See, I can't agree. I love SNOT too (I can never get over the urge to go "ew" to that) but the military plain-ness really helps in this case. It gives the platform a sense of "edifice" or "fortification"; add that to the curvature at the nose (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)

27 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR