To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.mechaOpen lugnet.build.mecha in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Mecha / 11906
11905  |  11907
Subject: 
Re: New MOC:
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.mecha
Date: 
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 04:15:28 GMT
Viewed: 
589 times
  
In lugnet.build.mecha, Mark Neumann wrote:
  
Jeesh, If I must. Mladen you wonderful fool you. why do I keep getting this feeling that 2005 is gonna be a special year?

Heh! GO ‘05!

  
Ok, I see all the good stuff that makes for Mladen battle platforms. I see a few more studs than what is normal, I’ll chalk that up to cheap minifig labor cuts, as is customary these days.

Yep, the minifigs are always to blame.

Honestly though, I can’t cover up everything, nor do I want to sometimes.

  
I see the rocking cockpic seat. That’s just fantastic. Reminds me of the big sled platform from Akira actually. Sweet.

Yeah, I wanted to make this mecha very detailed. My logic was to make the basic grey, dk. grey, and blue frame, and then add black, white, and yellow in certain areas to denote “machinery”.

  
Legs are a good mix of beefy yet sized to match body. Not too big, not too small, just right. The heel (?) supports are nicely integrated. That is to say they don’t stand out at all and they (I’m guessing) fufil your needs to get the leg to support itself. Function and form, nice.

Yeah, for anyone wanting to build a multiped at this scale, and not use gearing, the heel is the KEY. If it goes, the whole models goes down with it.

  
Armed to the teeth in the legs. or would that just simply be, armed to the legs? hahaha..... ah well.

Heh, I actually wanted to add more missiles... Ran out of 1x1 red and white rounds though. :-P

  
The danger stripes on the legs give a sharp contrast (color wise) and add a nice detail. A bit of flash as it were.

Yes, that was my intent. See reply above.

  
Compared to the legs the body core (not the wings) is plain, almost too plain. Not boxy, just flat when compared to the depth and texture of the legs.

As usual, you’re right on the mark, MARK! ;-)

The thing is, as much as I love SNOT, I don’t use it for everything, especially when building something as simple a wall. Guess I should have used it more though, to give the siding not just more texture, but more shape and as you say create “depth”.

  
You’ve done it again sir. woof.

Thanks again.

Mladen Pejic

  
Mark Neumann



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: New MOC:
 
(...) See, I can't agree. I love SNOT too (I can never get over the urge to go "ew" to that) but the military plain-ness really helps in this case. It gives the platform a sense of "edifice" or "fortification"; add that to the curvature at the nose (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New MOC:
 
(...) Jeesh, If I must. Mladen you wonderful fool you. why do I keep getting this feeling that 2005 is gonna be a special year? Ok, I see all the good stuff that makes for Mladen battle platforms. I see a few more studs than what is normal, I'll (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)

27 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR