To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.ancientOpen lugnet.build.ancient in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Ancient / 358
357  |  359
Subject: 
Re: The Brick Testament lays down The Law
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.ancient
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:31:09 GMT
Viewed: 
2010 times
  
In lugnet.build.ancient, Rick Clark wrote:
In lugnet.build.ancient, Brendan Powell Smith wrote:
Of course, much more
interesting to me is God commnding "eye for eye and tooth for tooth", etc.

That passage is much misunderstood. At the time it was written, it instructed
a *limit* to retribution, not an encouragement to revenge. Prior to "Eye for
eye" laws, it was much more common for the people to follow the practice of
"Death for eye." Yikes!

For more info, see
<http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_eye_for_an_eye>

If we're just looking at this law as man-made, devoid of any divinely-commanded
or divinely-inspired status, in that case, I don't really find it all that
disturbing or surprising considering when it was written and compared with the
laws/morality of other ancient societies.

What *is* disturbing to me is that people now, in modern times, view this as
God's divine law for humanity.  Or rather, what is confusing to me is why modern
people still laud, say, the Ten Commandments while dismissing this and other
much more obviously disturbing laws from the same section of the same book.

But if we're not talking about this from a religious standpoint, your point
about limiting revenge is well taken.  That law, at that time, may well have
been an improvement, but it hardly seems like the sort of perfect moral law one
would expect from God (if one believes God to be morally perfect, that is).  The
whole point of my illustrating these laws set in modern times is to highlight
how awful and barbaric they are compared to our modern sense of morality.

-Rev. Smith



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Brick Testament lays down The Law
 
(...) That passage is much misunderstood. At the time it was written, it instructed a to retribution, not an encouragement to revenge. Prior to "Eye for eye" laws, it was much more common for the people to follow the practice of "Death for eye." (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.ancient, FTX)

27 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR