 | | Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
|
|
(...) It's just that I find so much of the Bible to be "juicy", whether it's because the stories are surprising, utterly outrageous, or just fun. That book is just loaded with good stuff. There won't be very much, in the end, that I'll have (...) (22 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.build.ancient)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
|
|
(...) It depends if you want to consider each and every point individually (which seems like a valid approach to me) or are trying to present an overall point that perhaps you have flogged to death already. Having said that, I'm not sure what real (...) (22 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.build.ancient)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
|
|
(...) At least be honest. Your "work" is mockery. It must be very amusing to you to have Christians praise the stories in the BT. Suckers! ;-) JOHN (22 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.build.ancient, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
|
|
(...) Hmm? Well, still illustrating the same book... (...) In my opinion, The Brick Testament itself does not make an argument for or against Christianity, Judaism, or any religion. It merely presents evidence for consideration. And in my view, (...) (22 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.build.ancient)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament: A Family Stoned and a City Massacred
|
|
(...) Thanks, Stephane, but I can take only so much credit for the work being "killer". ;) (...) temple gate MOC (appropriately enough in his depiction of Jesus bearing his own cross): (URL) I've mentioned to Bruce, I don't find it to be a perfect (...) (22 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.build.ancient)
|
