 | | Re: Basic Commuter Jet
|
|
(...) Mine's got over 310,000 miles on it, and it'll go a lot Moore! :-) Maggie C. (22 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Re: Basic Commuter Jet
|
|
(...) Pick the movie: "They're boxy, but they're good!" ROSCO (22 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Re: Basic Commuter Jet
|
|
(...) (snip (...) Pretty neat, considering it's predominantly brick. I really like that you put in the interior detail and made it true minifig scale. And big and boxy doesn't take anything away from the plane, you went pretty far with only bricks. (...) (22 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Basic Commuter Jet
|
|
I've been searching through old albums at home... Way back in 1995, when I was emerging from my dark ages, a built a commuter jet out of bricks in my (predominantly basic) connection. Here are some pics: Loading passengers (gotta love those 20x10x1 (...) (22 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.basic, lugnet.announce.moc)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatup .basic
|
|
Just saw this thread. (...) There was one Basic-ish Space set I can think of: (URL) mini-figs, and definitely not town. Cool set. (...) Gail Meagher (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatup .basic
|
|
(...) If you are to be so hard on the definitions I don't think BASIC should have a theme at all! :) (...) Same goes with me, both facts! Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when e-mailing) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatup .basic
|
|
"Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:HA6tsG.LsA@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) I did consider that one, but decided it isn't really my idea of "Basic". Personally, I think the true "basic" feel doesn't even have minifigs, (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatup .basic
|
|
"Jon Palmer" <jon@zemi.net> wrote in message news:HA61D4.BMv@lugnet.com... (...) have (...) something (...) Hmm ... one of my Basic favorites is 725 - (URL) This set has a great selection of parts. I have managed to pick up two of them over the (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatup .basic
|
|
(...) I suppose you don't consider <set:375> (or <set:6075> ) as BASIC? Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when e-mailing) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatup .basic
|
|
"Hendo (John P. Henderson)" <hendo@valyance.com> wrote in message news:HA6347.Hzn@lugnet.com... (...) :) Doh. Forgot about that one. Now that is a good word too. Makes me think of useful parts and cool box art. (...) would (...) collection but I (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatup .basic
|
|
(...) Don't forget "Universal", which was what it was called when I got my first one of these sets. I agree the word "Basic" was more... well... Basic. :) Excluding the 4017 and 3033 (which I view more as Bulk supplements), I would say my favorite (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatup .basic
|
|
Me again. I would also like to mention that I like the word "Basic" much more than "Freestyle","Classic", or "Creator". Anyone else have a preferred word? [ j o n ] -- | Lego - (URL) Shipyard - (URL) Moonbase - (URL) Store - (URL) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Whatup .basic
|
|
Alright folks, I'm ready to get down with some basic talk. Any of you have a favorite set? I can't think of mine at the moment but I'm going to go browse the database in a bit and try to dig up the name and number of some of my childhood favorites. (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is this part from
|
|
Hello, Thank you Scott S. It was the one without the axel hole. It was for the Galatic Starship 6893. Thank you for your quick response. Lars Gertsen - Denmark "Scott E. Sanburn" <ls_ses@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Gxyyu5.Luu@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.town, lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is this part from
|
|
Dan & All, (...) the Blockade Runner, which I doubt Lars has in his stash of old LEGO items (It would be nice, though! ; ) ). Maybe the other part without the axle hole is the one he is looking for, since there are a few older sets that have that (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.town, lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is this part from
|
|
(...) several sets found in the Peeron database: (URL) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.town, lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Where is this part from
|
|
Hello, I have got hold om some old Lego with drawings. However I found a part (2 pcs) which was not on any picture. It was two 6 x 6 Octagonal Roof ((URL) white (2 pcs). Anybody know which set these are form? Lars Gertsen - denmark (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.town, lugnet.basic)
|
| |
| | Re: legends/re-releases
|
|
(...) Oh my yes... Both of them rock! To have known then what I know now. (of course I would also have been well served to invest in a few other things that were cheap in 1985, but I digress) (23 years ago, 2-May-02, to lugnet.basic, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: legends/re-releases
|
|
725 is an awesome basic set. Go look at it. It truly bore out the Lego promise of "just the right amount of special pieces to encourage special creations." It actually came with instructions for set-quality models. Notice how its pieces are (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-02, to lugnet.basic, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: legends/re-releases
|
|
(...) I agree these sets are some of the best basic sets that were put out. I would also like to add 720 to the line-up. Another good source for parts, including 2 white "warehouse" doors and 4 red door "runners" for the doors. All in all, very (...) (23 years ago, 1-May-02, to lugnet.basic, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.town)
|
