 | | Re: 2000 scans —Mark Lindsey
|
| | | (...) Question all you want. I have the right as an American citizen to tell any other American citizens and anyone else who wants to listen around the world via the mircle of the internet anything I want. I told everyone that cared I had images (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 2000 scans —Paul Davidson
|
| | | | | I love the Internet. :) Man, I dreamt last night that I found a store that had accidentally received and stocked the 2000 Adventurers Lego. Too bad I woke up... -- Paul Davidson Mark Lindsey <markwars@fcmail.com> wrote in message (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 2000 scans —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) 1) Thanks for the scans. Unfortunately.... 2) Lego just made its policy clear. They are well within their rights as I understand the situation. 3) One last look, and then I wipe the scans from my system. Sigh. I'm looking forward to the real (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 2000 scans —Richard Franks
|
| | | | (...) God Bless America. Actually, I don't really see what your nationality has to do with it! (...) A URL is a means to access information, emailling you gains the same information - I don't see that there is much difference. Certainly, many people (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 scans —Mark Lindsey
|
| | | | (...) do (...) The right of free speech is a cornerstone of American ideology. I did sound a bit preachy however, and for that I apologize. I was simply illustrating that I thought someone telling me not to share information I have with interested (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 scans —Paul Davidson
|
| | | | | I'd like to say that anyone who follows toy collecting *at all* on the web knows that sneak peaks, photos, scans, etc. are the norm, not the exception, in general. Why, there are literally dozens of web sites dedicated to sneaking early pictures and (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 scans —Richard Franks
|
| | | | (...) If you think about the vast number of television programmes that spew forth from America and pollute the rest of the world.. then it isn't that suprising that people have this opinion. Almost every other idiot on television is an American, (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 scans —Tom Boucher
|
| | | | | <sarcasm> yes it just pleases me to no end that shows like 'Dawson's Creek', 'Friends' and 'Beverly Hills 90210' go to other countries. </sarcasm> They're bad enough in this country where we know there is no way someone lives like that, let alone (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 scans —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) I dunno. I've seen some pretty awful American tourists. That might not mean (...) It's all a balancing act -- the issue of "your rights end where my nose starts" writ large. Generally, it's been acknowledged that certain intellectual property (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 scans —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | (...) You're all ready to go on Jerry Springer as guest, or worse, audience, or worse yet, host. Aren't you? Jasper (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 scans —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | (...) Maybe even squicky? Jasper "Doing my bit for tasteless bad punsters everywhere" Janssen (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2000 scans —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) Agh! There will be NO alt.tasteless here! (Well, I hope not much, anyhow.) -resisting the urge to build on squicking puns, LFB. (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2000 scans —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | (...) It may not be such a good idea, now that I think about it. At least let's keep it to subtle references nobody gets unless they're otherwise introduced - the explanation would not be suitable for a family newsgroup. Email's open for questions (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2000 scans —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) to (...) You mean....that all brits *aren't* like Basil Fawlty? Gosh, what a revelation! :-) Bruce (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
