Subject:
|
Re: whoop de doo
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Apr 2000 02:01:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4690 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.terms, Kevin Salm writes:
> Anyway, I just used Alans string of test messages to test out the SUBMIT
> RATINGS feature. It did not work for me. Here is what I did:
> I pulled up the thread display
> http://www.lugnet.com/off-topic/test/?n=1523&t=i&v=c
> and then selected the last few messages first by clicking one of the dots,
> then I rated it and then clicked the next post icon in the Light Blue band
> at the top of the page.
Hmm. There actually isn't any next-post icon in the light blue band. Do you
mean that you clicked an underlined number in the light blue band to proceed
to the next message? If so, that causes an HTTP GET request, not an HTTP
post request.
> Repeated the process five or six times. Then called up the
> thread display again and hit SUBMIT RATINGS.
> No good. Did not change the ratings for the messages.
If you haven't omitted any steps from the description above, that's the
correct result.
> Any tips or procedural info??
Did you forget to press the "Submit Rating" button each time before walking
to the next message? It doesn't buffer up your ratings from page to page.
When you click "Submit Ratings", that button is part of an HTML form that
applies to the radio buttons on that page display only. What did the radio
buttons show at the time you clicked "Submit Ratings"? (Sounds like they
were blank...?)
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: whoop de doo
|
| (...) Okay, I think I understand. So, right now the submit ratings button on a thread display page is useless and serves no purpose, as I understand you. I guess we are all resigned to submit individual ratings on a per-message basis (not a (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: whoop de doo
|
| (...) (URL) -- to an excessive extent! (Note that Alan's post 1520 was 3 minutes before (...) I do not know why Alan did what he did, but there may be reason. I will concede that 83 messages is a bit excessive, however. Anyway, I just used Alans (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
