| | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
|
|
(...) Not really. Seller run auctions create more traffic because of the constant updates, but ebay auction announcements are usually a single or 2 shot deal. Many B-S-T posts fall in that level of traffic. Yet, many people seem to dislike ebay (...) (24 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
|
| | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
|
|
(...) I think there is, and I chose that word/phrase because I thought it would indicate that it is a potentially charged issue. People are forbidden to post auctions to any group but .market.auction. People can post "I'm selling this ..." messages (...) (24 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms) !
|
|
| | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
|
|
<snipped much text that I completely agree with> (...) Precisely. I dislike seeing b-s-t posts in theme-NGs just as much as I dislike auction posts (1). I'd be happy to add anything, but Mike said it all. -Shiri (1) I do not completely dislike them, (...) (24 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
|
| | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) traffic (...) exist, (...) to (...) I think there is a "double standard" in that auction posts are singled out as particularly bad. This is not necessarily a bad thing (we also have a "double standard" on (...) (24 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
|
| | Re: C'mon already...
|
|
(...) no... (...) yes. (URL) I request that the ban be lifted. Not because I have anything to say in that (...) The block is now removed. --Todd (24 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
|
| | C'mon already...
|
|
Todd: Don't you think that my continuing to be banned from "Dear-Lego" is sort of overkill? I did already ask to have my full lugnet posting privileges reinstated, but perhaps you did not notice...wasn't the ban to be lifted upon my request? I (...) (24 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
|
| | Re: Reminder: auction announcements in .market.auction only
|
|
Sorry. :-) "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> ha scritto nel messaggio news:Fsv926.EE4@lugnet.com... (...) explicitly (...) (24 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
|
| | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
|
|
guito <guito@guito.dhs.org> wrote in message news:slrn8f6lu7.ebp....ome.com... (...) solicitations. (...) As of _now_ there have been 102 posts to .auction and 103 to .bst in the last 7 days. If you add to that the trade posts dotted around all the (...) (24 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
|
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
|
| | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
|
|
(...) I disagree that there is a "double-standard" (but that's just wording), but I agree that it would go a long way toward eliminating gray areas -- if the boundaries could be defined clearly (which I'm very skeptical of). Some things to figure (...) (24 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms) !
|