| |
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> writes:
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, William R. Ward writes:
> > I think s/=$/\n/ would be adequate for that case. You could always
> > improve it later.
>
> Adding a second newline?
>
> You mean $body =~ s/=\n/\n/g or $body =~ s/=$//m ?
Yes, that's what I meant.
> Any of those would break words in half. (The = at the end isn't guaranteed
> to occur at a line break.)
It's usually at a line break, though, isn't it? And even so it is
better than what is currently displayed; further refinements could be
made to make it better yet...
Or just let the browser do the word wrapping in this case.
--
William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by
little statesmen and philosophers and divines." - Emerson
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: quoted-printable support
|
| (...) On the well-behaved e-mail clients, yes. On the worse clients, they jam a whole paragraph into a single line. I saw one which resulted in a line 890 characters long.(!) (...) I agree -- a hideously long line is better than one that's full of (...) (21 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
Message is in Reply To:
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
