 | | Re: leaving LUGNET
|
| (...) Well please take a look at the small print at the bottom of my Lugnet page: (URL) It is *my* information, and keeping a copy without my permission would be rude, and arguably (lawyers do like to argue about that kind of stuff) breach of (...) (20 years ago, 4-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: leaving LUGNET
|
| (...) Please note: I am not a lawyer, nor am I Todd Lehman, the following is just my own personal best understanding of Lugnet's terms of use and intentions. Note however this statement in the TOS: 7. By posting messages, uploading files, inputting (...) (20 years ago, 4-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: leaving LUGNET
|
| (...) But see also the ToS, point 7: - start - 7. By posting messages, uploading files, inputting data, or engaging in any other form of communication through this service, you are granting LUGNET and its owners a perpetual, irrevocable, royalty- (...) (20 years ago, 4-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: leaving LUGNET
|
| (...) Again, I'm not saying that Lugnet really shouldn't remove data if someone asks. But if there's going to be an easily accessible system, I'd prefer "hide" over "remove". If there's a court order, or someone really does specify that they want (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: leaving LUGNET
|
| (...) I only said it was rude and *arguably* had legal implications. That is still my opinion. I doubt I would personally even investigate legal action if my pages were restored after I deleted them, but it would certainly sour my taste of Lugnet. (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: leaving LUGNET
|
| (...) AFAIK, yes. When you just set the page to a blank, it IS just another version. The older version would be availalbe for everyone to see with some arcane syntax. (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
