 | | Re: Vote to unhighlight?
|
|
(...) Something sort of like this (but not exactly) is how things used to work, posts started at 50 and you could assign 20 or 0 or 60 or 100 or any multiple of 10 up to 100... (21 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Vote to unhighlight?
|
|
(...) I think this has been suggested before. Trouble is, it's open to abuse. If you don't like someone, you can go and "unhighlight" all their posts, effectively censoring them (a bit). ROSCO (21 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Vote to unhighlight?
|
|
Why can the highlight state olny get brighter? I'd like to be able to vote to unhighlight. That gives the majority of those that have an opinion to have things the way they want. Respectfully, Kevin (21 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: my “button pushing” opinion! ;)
|
|
(...) ...and I thought he only got 45% of the vote. ;) (...) I’m beginning to feel that he is being bloody-minded on this issue. Scott A (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Highlight prevension
|
|
Is there a way to prevent your own post from being highlighted? I don't like the fact that so much of what went on in admin.general was highlighted. I don't think it was good for the bulk of the people on LUGNET. I also don't think it contributed to (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
|
(...) My two cents here... I'm not an admin and this just my opinion. If I recall correctly, Space gets it's own newsgroup because it is an official subtheme. Mecha is not an official subtheme and unfortunately gets buried in the .Build newsgroup. I (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
|
(...) I would assume so. When you create an FTX formatted post, it turns the post into an FTX page. Any valid FTX should be useable, and any dynamic FTX (such as NewsSpotlight) should continue to be dynamic. Frank (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
|
(...) Interesting. I did not know that, or if I did I've forgotten about it. Is the embedded spotlight dynamic? If I post with an embedded spotlight will it update as new posts are spotlighted? -Duane (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
|
(...) And posts also: [NewsSpotlight lugnet.pirates] Frank (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
|
(...) One thing also to point out, you can put a spotlight for any group on any page, so it would be quite possible to put a lugnet.build.mecha spotlight on the lugnet.space page. Frank (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
|
(...) Some informal, unofficial feedback. The admins have bounced this around a bit. As we see it there are 3 main options: - leave mecha where it is, at build.mecha - move mecha to a new top level group, like .trains (your request explains that you (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
|
(...) if I missed one. Going forward, it's not necessary to post cancel requests, you can mail them to any admin. It's not really WRONG to post the request, I suppose, but it's a bit cluttering. (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SciBrick is looking for you!
|
|
(...) With respect to SciBrick, please cancel this post: (URL) you. Eric Sophie Memeber# 1051 (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.scibrick, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
|
I made this post out of frustration, and without consulting my co-curator. Please cancel this post: (URL) you. Eric Sophie Member # 1051 (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting Policy Changes
|
|
(...) Good suggestion. XFUT to admin.suggestions Please feel free to XFUT any others from this string that seem like they ought to be suggestions as well. (21 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET members association
|
|
(...) Lenny, I never said all the people would believe such assurances all the time. But I still think it's worth providing them. ROSCO (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET members association
|
|
(...) Thanks. For everything you said. "I can think of a hundred things I'd rather do than debate this stuff." Ya, me too! I'll see your 100 and raise you a hundred. Emotions have run high here, but your recent actions convince me I was wrong to (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET members association
|
|
(...) Well, Lenny, Larry and I have had some conversations, especially when the LPRV was first formed, and he acknowledged that he felt that Admins should be held to a higher standard hat on, or hat off. So Larry beleives there should be a double (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: my “button pushing” opinion! ;)
|
|
(...) My miscounting was wrong, and I was wrong to say Larry did any abusive emailing. I respectfully request that (URL) post be cancelled, so that Larry no longer has to defend himself against false charges. (...) Not in my opinion. Kevin (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: my “button pushing” opinion! ;)
|
|
(...) Yeah, a lot of people. But MOST people think that Larry is suitable to be an admin. And most importantly, Todd thinks Larry is an excellent choice to be an admin - as it is Todd's choice to empower an Admin or not. -Lenny (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
