 | | Re: leaving LUGNET
|
|
(...) I stongly object to this idea. -Orion (21 years ago, 4-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | leaving LUGNET
|
|
Hi: I easily found a link to join LUGNET, but did not stumble across one to leave LUGNET. For instance, a link to 'Leave Group' is on the front page of all joined Yahoo groups. I recommend exposing a link that allows: - removing oneself from the (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Cancelling posts
|
|
Something freaky happens when I search Lugnet for the F-bomb. Try it yourself - it returns several cancelled posts. Now I'm guessing that the actual post is irrevocably removed, but it's entry is not removed from the index. This may be something you (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Except that this step isn't happening right now. The server doesn't actually know that this post is from member 179 - it just knows that this email addressed has been allowed to post with these headers. Yes, updating the posting setup form to (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Just to clarify - this is the total number of posts in 2004 - by everyone, logged in, web, email, news, you name it. (21 years ago, 1-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) I do think it would be a good idea. With the current imlpementation though, I don't think it's easy to actually corralate posts with the memebers who post them. (21 years ago, 1-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Simple, timely and sentimental - makes sense to me. Also, highlights are about the post, not the MOC. One could argue that most of the people who would appreciate Kyle's MOC (.mecha-meisters and .space-cadets) would have already seen his post (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Agreed. No way would you want someone to send a password in plain text. (...) That's what I was thinking - same as current posting authentication. (...) Hmmn. Good point; this could be (mostly) addressed during the authentication stage: For (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Well, the issue would really be authenticating the user as a member, and making sure the message didn't get posted if they composed it incorrectly. Since only members are allowed to vote (and when viewing from SMTP/NNTP you can't see (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) Hmmmn. I don't know what to make of those numbers - except that its a very high number people who just don't see the "highlighting" drilldown. SUGGESTION Clearly Todd already has * a way of highlighting posts * parsing emails to take actions * (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
