 | | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Mark Jordan wrote: snipped out some great suggestions. (...) Lugnet is a different then many forums because of personal disclosure of names. There is more credibility instead of "hiding" behind nicknames, an alias or (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Language Choices and LUGNET
|
|
(...) I'm glad you said that, because its true, and an uncomfortable fact. I was trying to find a way of saying it myself, but couldn't figure it out. Here are some thoughts on how to minimise the "bad fun" effect. Maybe I am lazy, but I'm more (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Public comments of sets in database
|
|
Personal opinion follows (...) Seems a good list to me. (...) Nod. you COULD argue the ToS aleady addresses this in that it talks about all submitted data, but on the other hand a lot of stuff in there applies to "Discussion Groups" and that ought (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Public comments of sets in database
|
|
(...) I would expect that the TOU should be changed from describing behavior in discussion groups to simply behavior on Lugnet. Theoretically, in addition to the set database, you've got: - curators putting data on the newsgroup front pages - (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Public comments of sets in database
|
|
(...) He could have said "small red elements are mixed in with my big brown elements". (21 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
