To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.suggestionsOpen lugnet.admin.suggestions in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Suggestions / 1112
1111  |  1113
Subject: 
Re: Public comments of sets in database
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.suggestions
Date: 
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:53:46 GMT
Viewed: 
3625 times
  
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Todd Lehman wrote:
Since this is uncharted (or virutally uncharted) territory here (since
this is in the set database comments rather than in a discussion group),
it's not clear what, if any, administrative action to take, nor what the
outcome of such action might be.  I'm not saying that nothing should be
done, I'm just saying this is a new gray area (to my knowledge).

I would expect that the TOU should be changed from describing behavior in
discussion groups to simply behavior on Lugnet. Theoretically, in addition to
the set database, you've got:

- curators putting data on the newsgroup front pages
- members writing their own profile
- members writing their own Lugnet FTX webpages
- set guide admins putting in comments into sets
- admins (maybe someday) putting info into the main page (or other common areas)

Back before Lugnet had members or so much web-functionality (or spread out
administration), the primary area of concern was the discussion groups. But
really, I'd put my money on having that "code of ethics" apply to all publically
viewable data transmitted to Lugnet. (IE, it's not a TOU violation to send a
vulgar email to a Lugnet email address, or put up a vulgar comment in your
privately viewable comment area)

DaveE



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Public comments of sets in database
 
Personal opinion follows (...) Seems a good list to me. (...) Nod. you COULD argue the ToS aleady addresses this in that it talks about all submitted data, but on the other hand a lot of stuff in there applies to "Discussion Groups" and that ought (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Public comments of sets in database
 
(...) Eww, ya, that's gross. To answer your question -- Is it technically possible? Yes. Is it obligatory? No. Is it warranted? That's a very good question -- and a tough one. Obviously, this doesn't actually answer your question, however. (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)

7 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR