Subject:
|
Re: Public comments of sets in database
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:13:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4262 times
|
| |
|
|
Personal opinion follows
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, David Eaton wrote:
> I would expect that the TOU should be changed from describing behavior in
> discussion groups to simply behavior on Lugnet. Theoretically, in addition to
> the set database, you've got:
>
> - curators putting data on the newsgroup front pages
> - members writing their own profile
> - members writing their own Lugnet FTX webpages
> - set guide admins putting in comments into sets
> - admins (maybe someday) putting info into the main page (or other common areas)
Seems a good list to me.
> Back before Lugnet had members or so much web-functionality (or spread out
> administration), the primary area of concern was the discussion groups. But
> really, I'd put my money on having that "code of ethics" apply to all publically
> viewable data transmitted to Lugnet.
Nod. you COULD argue the ToS aleady addresses this in that it talks about all
submitted data, but on the other hand a lot of stuff in there applies to
"Discussion Groups" and that ought to be, long term, broadened.
> (IE, it's not a TOU violation to send a
> vulgar email to a Lugnet email address, or put up a vulgar comment in your
> privately viewable comment area)
these counter examples are spot on and illustrate nicely what's meant. Thanks
for thinking about this!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Public comments of sets in database
|
| (...) I would expect that the TOU should be changed from describing behavior in discussion groups to simply behavior on Lugnet. Theoretically, in addition to the set database, you've got: - curators putting data on the newsgroup front pages - (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
