To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.suggestionsOpen lugnet.admin.suggestions in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Suggestions / *1080 (-20)
  Re: Request for .vignette group
 
(...) I'll ask. There is a way to tell mail subscriptions already but I am not sure about nntp transmissions or web views... (22 years ago, 23-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 
  Re: Request for .vignette group
 
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Bruce Hietbrink wrote: snip (...) Snip. Oui, vous êtes le père du vignette. Makuto(?), meanwhile, seems to have disappeared from Brickshelf !?! (...) Thanks, Bruce. I very much enjoyed your recent vignettes, especially (...) (22 years ago, 23-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
 
  Re: Request for .vignette group
 
(...) Wouldn't that be classic-castle.com? :P Just kidding. I feel a little paternal to this recent fad on English. I had noticed that three Japanese builders had built similar MOCs and mentioned it in a thread on classic-castle: (URL) subsequently (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 
  Re: Request for .vignette group
 
(...) Ahhh... That explains why mecha got a group! ;-) Cheers Richie Dulin (22 years ago, 22-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 
  Re: Request for .vignette group
 
(...) But that's fine, because people who don't read .aquazone (and do read LUGNET) are rational actors who act as they do because they *don't care* about Aquazone. They have chosen which MOCs they consider worthy of their interest by their (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Request for .vignette group
 
(...) Sorry - I meant to say .build.vignette (Thanks, ROSCO!), but it was late when I did my initial post. My thoughts on this was to have a place to group/view MOCs of the small scale. There are newsgroups more suited for 'large-scale' MOCs: such (...) (22 years ago, 21-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
 
  Re: Request for .vignette group
 
(...) Note, this is my personal thinking, not official policy! I'm not sure that we ought to create a new group for every "fad" building style that comes along unless it has legs. Vignettes are very neat, I agree, but I'm not sure they have (...) (22 years ago, 21-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 
  Re: Request for .vignette group
 
(...) My suggestion would be .build.vignette. ROSCO (22 years ago, 21-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 
  Request for .vignette group
 
Dear LUGNET Admin, I would like to formally request (suggest) that a newsgroup (.moc.vignette or something similar) be created. There have been numerous posts of 'vignette' MOCs over the past few weeks, and I, for one, feel that there is a (...) (22 years ago, 21-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 
  Re: csotw
 
(...) admin I have time on my hands and I am at my pc pretty much 24/7 as I work online.Just waiting to hear if admin wants this and hopefully it'll be up and running soon :) regards Shay (22 years ago, 21-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)  
 
  Re: Smiley Icons?
 
"Mark Riley" <markril@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:I5L9yz.19GL@lugnet.com... (...) sure (...) we (...) "cheese" (...) the (...) I'm using a normal (MS Outlook Express) news reader to read and write post on lugnet. So those smileys would just (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 
  Re: Smiley Icons?
 
(...) Thanks Jan-Albert, for mentioning Lowlug :-D However, originally these smilies come from (URL) :-) I thought I'd mention it. I think implementing smilies would be a very nice feature, and these minifigsmilies are just very cool! Saskia (...) (22 years ago, 17-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 
  Re: Smiley Icons?
 
Mark Riley wrote in message ... (...) we (...) "cheese" (...) the (...) As long as they don't mess up NNTP any more than misused FTX already does, and we can turn 'em off for the web interface, fine. But as Larry says, there are higher priority (...) (22 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 
  Re: Smiley Icons?
 
Good idea; this place needs more (URL) . Scott A (22 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
 
  Re: Smiley Icons?
 
(...) I'd like to speak out against it, or at best state that it ought to be low priority. At least until and unless there is a far wider base of coding talent that's contributing to LUGNET development. Two reasons I think there are a number of much (...) (22 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
 
  Re: Smiley Icons?
 
(...) Yeah, heheh, the smile on that head looks more like a smirk. But, like I said, it was just a quick hack! :-) Mark (22 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
 
  Re: Smiley Icons?
 
(...) Actually, check here for smileys: (URL) (22 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 
  Re: Smiley Icons?
 
(...) If this type of minifig head emoticon would be implimented, then maybe Janey R B would FINALLY use smilely faces!! Or in her case, using more of the sarcastic face may be appropriate (wink). Bob (22 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
 
  Re: Smiley Icons?
 
(...) Check out (URL) for many minifig smilies However, I hope this won't mess up the NNTP service, as I still refuse to convert to web-based posting (22 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 
  Smiley Icons?
 
OK, doh! After composing this, I just did a search on "emoticons" and sure enough, this was (URL) discussed> a while ago. What ever happened to it? Hi All, Smiley icons seem to be all the rage on many other forums on the net, but we don't have any (...) (22 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR