Subject:
|
Re: A possible enhancement idea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:26:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
739 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Dan Boger writes:
> can't just fork the job to the background, say "It's done!", so the user
> can go on it's way, and the server take it's sweet (niced :) time posting
> the articles?
Oh. Hmm. Yes, excellent idea. Or spool it into a processing queue that gets
processed frequently and in a serial way. :-)
--
Todd S. Lehman | LUGNET Admin <todd@lugnet.com>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A possible enhancement idea
|
| (...) can't just fork the job to the background, say "It's done!", so the user can go on it's way, and the server take it's sweet (niced :) time posting the articles? (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
