Subject:
|
Re: E-mail authentication during posting
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:30:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
446 times
|
| |
|
|
Horst Lehner wrote:
> Will it be possible to confirm more than one message at once, with just a
> single URL? I think there could be a list of pending posts, with a checkbox
> near each of them. The paranoid default could be that none of them is
> checked. When I click "Post It", all checked ones would be posted. All
> unchecked postings would be discarded, or dealt with in any other
> appropriate way.
A followup thought to this - provide a "confirm my posts" link to the
web interface when you are logged on. This would allow use of NNTP to
post (I much prefer it due to a variety of interface issues, including
size of the area to type the message in), but skip waiting for the
e-mail to confirm.
I was really hoping the NNTP authentication could be used to make that a
one stop solution.
I hope we can get read/unread marking and filtering in the web interface
soon. That would probably allow me to switch over to exclusively web
interface.
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: E-mail authentication during posting
|
| (...) Wouldn't that allow a determined spoofer to wait till it was obvious that someone known to be a member was logged in (say if he saw a flurry of posts from you in .pirate within a few min of each other) and then spoof as you, at least as long (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | Re: E-mail authentication during posting
|
| (...) Wouldn't that allow a determined spoofer to wait till it was obvious that someone known to be a member was logged in (say if he saw a flurry of posts from you in .pirate within a few min of each other) and then spoof as you, at least as long (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: E-mail authentication during posting
|
| Hello Todd, hello everybody, I can understand your rationale behind authentication, but find it annoying to frequently have to use a web interface for authentication. Therefore, this posting concentrates on implementation details, which could (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
