To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.nntpOpen lugnet.admin.nntp in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / NNTP / 528
527  |  529
Subject: 
Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.nntp
Date: 
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:09:26 GMT
Viewed: 
1668 times
  
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Roy Gal writes:
Sorry to clutter things up with separate posts:

Another issue is the fact that many LUGNET members have paid good money to
become members. I think those people's voices MUST (at least a strong
should...) be heard on this issue. We paid in part to support Todd & Suz's hard
work, but we should also get some things that we like in return.

So, I think it might be fair to ask paying members if they think TLC employees
should be allowed to post freely on all newsgroups. If none of us had paid into
this, I wouldn't see such a problem with Todd's edict,  but given that probably
dozens (or more?) people have paid, and TLC sure as heck paid, I think we
should be given a voice, although we might not be 100% entitled...

Roy

Good point!  Something that someone mentioned to me today but I forgot about
since then.  I'm a paying member and that should say something.  I'm also
sure other large contributors (unfortunately due to my financial state, I
was only able to give the minimum) want to be given a bit more consideration
with stuff like this, too.

-Tim



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
 
(...) I wholehartedly disagree. you decided you want to donate some money to lugnet, great. I think of it as paying for services I _already_ recieved from lugnet... I don't think we're stockholders that can set policy, or even need to be consulted. (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
  Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
 
(...) I hear the sentiment but I have to come out and say this: You pay (to become a member) which gives you right to use LUGNET in whatever form or shape it is in, subject to your not violating the ToS, not for the right to influence that form or (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
 
Sorry to clutter things up with separate posts: Another issue is the fact that many LUGNET members have paid good money to become members. I think those people's voices MUST (at least a strong should...) be heard on this issue. We paid in part to (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR