To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.nntpOpen lugnet.admin.nntp in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / NNTP / 527
526  |  528
Subject: 
Re: ME TOO
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp
Date: 
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:06:29 GMT
Viewed: 
81 times
  
In lugnet.lego.direct, Christian Gemünden writes:

Usually, I am not the buy who steps in for a "mee too" (as this is mostly
useless On Lugnet when talking about MOCs or new products. However, as this
is a really important subject for the entire philosophy of Lugnet, I had to
emphasize Mikes words, as they represent my opinion and I think each opinion
is important in this case.

I have to put in a hearty 'mee too' with you, Christian.

I personally dislike any decision that will result in limitation of
communication between TLC and AFOLs. And although Todd does not see this
change as "limitation", this recent incident has drawn my highest attention
as Lugnet has lost a big part of his value for me!

Its lost value for me too.  I prefer open communication, and not every post
of theirs at a lego.com address outside of lego.* groups can be considered a
marketing agenda.  Give me a break.

In case you disagree, put my posting aside as a regular "just his two
worthless cents" *OR* give me more reasons that better explain the reasons
that caused these hasty changes - I prefer the latter!

Unfortunately, given the number of posts against this, and the amount of
reconsidering being done, it looks like its the former.

With TLC's involvement in this group more, it won't be super-threatening
with marketing schtuff.  LEGO Direct has said they want open communication,
and right now we're getting it, and I think that's a good thing.  I'm sure
they want to do more in the future too, lets not hinder them.

I have a question, how does this fit with the lego.direct posting
restriction rules being considered?  If both were implemented, it would make
open communication *very* difficult.

-Tim



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: ME TOO
 
I've been skimming the posts about this issue, and maybe I'm missing the point, but it seems to me that if LEGO didn't want its people posting on lugnet, they woud take care of that at lego. Often you hear about people workgin at such-and-such and (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)

Message is in Reply To:
  ME TOO
 
(...) Usually, I am not the buy who steps in for a "mee too" (as this is mostly useless On Lugnet when talking about MOCs or new products. However, as this is a really important subject for the entire philosophy of Lugnet, I had to emphasize Mikes (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)

232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR