 | | Re: Mecha postings
|
|
(...) Yes, everyone posting mecha stuff: please set followups to the .build.mecha group when posting -- don't clutter the main .build group with mecha stuff when there's a focused group for it. Or even don't post to the main .build group. If someone (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jan-01, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Can't post via Outlook Express.
|
|
(...) The 'From:' header that your newsreader is sending, From: "Felipe G. Coury" <fcoury@creation.com.br> doesn't match what you filled out in the news-posting setup form. It's close, but it's not a match. You filled out the form saying that your (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jan-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | I can't see the messages I post in my newsreader
|
|
Hello, The messages does appear on lugnet, but not in my newsreader, What am I doing wrong? Any solutions? Thank you Diana (24 years ago, 13-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Not setting followups correctly (was Re: Blonde female minifig hair - does it exist?
|
|
May thanks for that Todd! Should have searched for that...I'm just off to hang my head in shame...:) Nicholas Allan "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G6x5yH.A13@lugnet.com... (...) have (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Not setting followups correctly (was Re: Blonde female minifig hair - does it exist?
|
|
(...) Yes. By design. (URL) Wouldn't this be a problem for Outlook Express users? How does (...) (URL) => .admin.nntp] (24 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) ... (...) Sergio Lorenzetti pointed out that I'm the 22nd in the list and that my LUGNET membership number is 22 too. Nice coincidence! Sergio himself ranked 42, "The ultimate answer" :-) Ciao Mario Lego web page: (URL) member page: (URL) (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Well, somewhat before the start. But I don't think the beta-messages count, I think Todd wiped them from the system. Steve (24 years ago, 8-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Out-of-office replies, mail header suggestion
|
|
(...) There's an 'Errors-To:' header that gets set. Some MDA's and MTA's don't make use of it, but most do. --Todd (24 years ago, 7-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Out-of-office replies, mail header suggestion
|
|
(...) The real problem is mail servers which send the "out-of-office" to the list, which on some list software which hasn't been fixed to deal with it generates a cascade of bad messages (when in addition, the mail server doesn't just send one (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Heeeheeee... I mean, c'mon, Steve, you even surpassed me!! Then again, you've posting here from the start, IIRC?... -Shiri (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Out-of-office replies, mail header suggestion
|
|
(...) Yup, you're right: "X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)" (...) My guess that it should be "bulk" was shaped by other mailing list I have compared the headers from and the info I found (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Out-of-office replies, mail header suggestion
|
|
(...) Eeek, what brain-dead mail delivery agent sent that? (By any chance was it MS Exchange?) (...) Well, a cursory scan of various mailing list software shows that some use "bulk" and some use "list" -- i.e., they don't all use "bulk". More seem (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Out-of-office replies, mail header suggestion
|
|
Hi Todd, I received an Out-of-office reply from someone who is subscribed via LUGNET's newsgroups per mail feature. This isn't really a problem but I noticed that the header generated by LUGNET contains the following line: "Precedence: list" however (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Netscape is annoying....
|
|
(...) Ahhh....great! Thanks Frank.....if I can just remember to follow the right-click procedure :) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Wow. 29th place. That is surprising - especially since I've been so quiet lately. I must have blabbed too much early on... :-) -- Terry K -- (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) OK, that's better. :) (...) anyway. (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) We're not sure exactly *where* they've gone, however. <GDR> ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Glad someone else said that. :-) ++Lar (raising next year's count with an essentially valueless post) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Netscape is annoying....
|
|
(...) No e-mail response. Frank (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Well, in your case quantity and quality have gone hand in hand, of course. :) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
