| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Nicholas Allan writes:
> > There WAS some talk of trying to suppress posts that didn't have
> > follow-ups set well... but no consensus. It's hard to tell what "well"
> > means and hard to do consistently across all types.
> >
> > (FUT .admin.general)
> >
> > ++Lar
>
> Would this have meant that posts without Follow-ups set would have been
> rejected?
Yes. By design.
http://news.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=459
> Wouldn't this be a problem for Outlook Express users? How does
> one set FUT in Outlook Express? Can one? Or is it a feature that MS have
> decided isn't important?
http://news.lugnet.com/?q=help+outlook+express+set+followup-to+header
--Todd
[xfut => .admin.nntp]
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
3 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
