Subject:
|
Re: Not setting followups correctly (was Re: Blonde female minifig hair - does it exist?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:33:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
324 times
|
| |
|
|
May thanks for that Todd! Should have searched for that...I'm just off to
hang my head in shame...:)
Nicholas Allan
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
news:G6x5yH.A13@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.admin.general, Nicholas Allan writes:
> > > There WAS some talk of trying to suppress posts that didn't have
> > > follow-ups set well... but no consensus. It's hard to tell what "well"
> > > means and hard to do consistently across all types.
> > >
> > > (FUT .admin.general)
> > >
> > > ++Lar
> >
> > Would this have meant that posts without Follow-ups set would have been
> > rejected?
>
> Yes. By design.
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=459
>
>
> > Wouldn't this be a problem for Outlook Express users? How does
> > one set FUT in Outlook Express? Can one? Or is it a feature that MS • have
> > decided isn't important?
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/?q=help+outlook+express+set+followup-to+header
>
> --Todd
>
> [xfut => .admin.nntp]
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
3 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
