 | | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Yeah, that's what I had remembered-- that Lugnet picked up on signatures at least when they adhered to the standard. I've never been one to take specific notice, but I was under the impression that most readers would automatically prepend "-- (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Now this is the stuff I'd like to see go away. I've never seen a post that is enhanced by 87 lines of text as a sig file. Pictures I can filter out if need be. Text is something I can't. -Dave (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) It's technically impossible, of course, to detect what a signature is. If you go by internet standards, then the line "-- " (that's two hyphens followed by a single space, followed by a newline character) is a standard signature delimiter -- (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Better, I suppose-- However, something that forced signatures to plain text might help too. That way at least only pictures that were part of the post content would show up. But yes, in general it might be nice to somehow restrict image size. (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Ya, the setting would have to go all the way down to zero, of course. --Todd (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
Quoting Todd Lehman <todd@lugnet.com>: (...) I, myself, wouldn't want to see *any*. An animated gif, no matter how small, is still terribly annoying. I suspect it won't be long before people have banners and avatars at the bottom of EVERY post, and (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) If there were a settting where you could specify not to embed images above a certain size, would that work? --Todd (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Hmm...maybe Content-Type: text/x-ftx isn't the right thing to set. I didn't expect it to confuse NNTP clients...but now that you mention it, it makes sense. If it instead said Content-Type: text/plain what do you think would be a good header (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) I agree, while it's an interesting feature, I'd really rather there not be any images contained in lugnet posts. Is it really that hard to deep-link to a brickshelf image instead? It quite frankly draws your attention away from the text, and (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Actually, could there be a cookie setting to turn them off (IE strip them out, not just show raw text) in the web interface? Personally, I never could stand signatures with images and all the other fancy, colorful junk that often gets thrown (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) I guess I'll reserve comment until I see how this gets used, but I'm really hoping it doesn't sound a death knell for use of news readers. One favor to ask though, while URL links show up as still clickable in a newsreader, all the nifty set (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
neat - can we make something that will filter out all the FTX in mail and NNTP? Currently, all the new posts show up as text/x-ftx, and until I tell mutt that that's plain text (with some noise), it doesn't display it at all. But cool for the web (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
I no longer have this problem. Jaco (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
I am very happy to announce three changes today to the LUGNET News web interface: Fixed-width font now used for plain-text messages. Once upon a time, when LUGNET first served up messages via the web, messages were displayed in a fixed-width font. (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: RFC: lugnet.build.aircraft
|
|
(...) If they're minifig scaled, can't they go in .Town, or maybe .modelteam if they're more detailed? I'm just thinking that .build.aircraft might be a bit specialized compared to stuff like .build.military, which encompasses military troops, (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | RFC: lugnet.build.aircraft
|
|
There is no appropriate place on LUGNET for Aircraft MOC's. If they are military planes, then they can be posted in lugnet.build.military, but for commercial or private aircraft models there is no single best place. I propose lugnet.build.aircraft (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:HFK23q.1ruD@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) used too! Mike (21 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
(...) Actually the .overview files weren't the culprit (which is good, because I was about to go insane trying to figure out why, if they were). The culprit was that when I applied this fix retro-actively to old articles: (URL) made backup/archive (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
Todd Lehman <todd@lugnet.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HFJzt6.13I2@lugnet.com... (...) I think sunday or monday (18. or 19. May). But as I synchronized the newsgroups yet the problems with "not downloaded" news are gone. Has anybody else noticed (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
(...) OK, that's consistent with the quoted-printable fix.[1] Quoted-printable tended to be more used in some areas and not in others. (...) Thanks for the list, Mike. Question: Is it fixed now? --Todd [1] (URL) (21 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
