To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / Search Results: password
 Results 241 – 260 of about 520.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Reducing fussiness in automated password appraisal
 
(...) I'd say level 2 is too easy. My current password doesn't fail until level 8. And one I'm playing with, trying to get the pattern down in my head and with my fingers, gets an outstanding even at level 12. (24 years ago, 8-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.185)

  Reducing fussiness in automated password appraisal
 
Many people feel that the Member password checks on LUGNET are overly stringent -- that it is too hard to come up with a good password that passes the strength appraisal: (URL) is also comfortable to remember. In anticipation of lowering the (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.people, lugnet.general)  
 

password
(score: 0.185)

  Re: member pack
 
(...) Hi Mark, did you get the e-mail that went out on September 14? I'll past a copy below, at the end of this message, just in case. I had hoped to get these out by the end of September but focused instead on AucZILLA XIII -- much more at stake (...) (24 years ago, 14-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.185)

  Re: LUGNET Memberships
 
(...) I started doing that about 2 weeks ago. It generates a password, sends an email with that password, then stores the encrypted password. The membership packet then contains a backup password. In the case of older members, or if someone deleted (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.185)

  Re: Password Tips
 
(...) Easially? (...) Hey, we better enhance the tester to prevent that password, it's kind of sort of easy to remember. <GD&R> Seriously, I like the active anti cracker defense idea a lot better and I think that's the better way to solve the (...) (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.185)

  Re: LUGNET Memberships
 
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G1zDMo.MIK@lugnet.com... (...) password, (...) I (...) have (...) confusion. (...) ID (...) three (...) (24 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.185)

  Re: Password checks (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
 
(...) No that would work, I wrote down the password you sent me and the two new ones I chose and they are pretty memorable, I hope. Implement something that generates a new password AND wipes out ALL the old ones in one fell swoop. Then send me the (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.185)

  Re: Reducing fussiness in automated password appraisal
 
(...) I found a big difference too. I have 4 or 5 passwords I use for my "non-critical" logins, and on the old system (lvl 2) they got a mixture of good & weak. On the new system they all get great on lvl 2 and good on lvl 3, so I agree, maybe lvl 3 (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.185)

  Re: Reducing fussiness in automated password appraisal
 
(...) Certainly *way* easier to pass. I'd even suggest using level 3. Level 2 passes "c00l!" (just barely). Would it be possible to kick up the relative strength of the dictionary check a bit? (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.185)

  Re: Password checks (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
 
(...) No, I meant exactly that: I didn't think that anyone would ever (a) forget their password or (b) not be able to just go look it up. When you put it in a cookie, you don't even have to remember it beyond that, unless you move to different (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.184)

  Re: Password checks (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
 
(...) I agree! In a cookie, you can put complete random garbage that only the authentication server knows how to interpret. And if certain bits contain an index, you can even use a one-time pad or other complex mapping to encrypt the data so that (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.184)

  Re: Password Tips
 
[Reposted with corrections. I read the results incorrectly; the basepoint for passing is 100%, not 0%.] (...) I shouldn't be wasting my time disspelling FUD like this, but as long as I said the above, I should really define what I mean by "there are (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.184)

  (canceled)
 
 

password
(score: 0.184)

  Re: Password Tips
 
(...) Here's a good one: Long,Term/P1an! Passed with +178% I think I've got the hang of it now. (...) Delaying positive and negative results and temporarally blocking ip's for logins that have too many tries is probably the best way to discourage (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.184)

  Re: Password Tips
 
(...) Gee, that was so funny I almost forgot to laugh. There are plenty of 6-character pw's that you can use that have 5 letters and one number or special character, and plenty of 7-character pw's that you can use that are all lowercase letters. I (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.184)

  Password Tips
 
(...) I just figured out how to easially pass the LUGNET pw test. Use lots of special characters. This one: ^n).F6'%#*><}{#: scores a whopping 900% with no warnings. Just make sure you throw in a number a lower case letter and an upper case letter (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.184)

  Re: Password checks (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
 
(...) I didn't plan for that. In the beginning, I honestly didn't think that anyone would ever forget their password (or at least not have it written down somewhere that they could find it). I'll have to come up with something. Since the pw's are (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.184)

  Re: LUGNET Memberships
 
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G21qt8.7zn@lugnet.com... (...) your (...) Okily Dokily. Thanks! (...) for (...) that (...) you (...) that (...) sloppy (...) Well, DBR - Dylan Bradley - Dylan Reardon - and my Account (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.184)

  Re: Password checks (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
 
(...) The BrickShelf uses the cookie returned *and* the ip address that the cookie was issued to for reauthenticate login. Nobody has complained about loosing login yet via multiple proxies (i.e. aol). Also, cookies can be made *much* more difficult (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.184)

  Re: LUGNET Memberships
 
(...) OK, that helps. I'll have the server send an e-mail to each of the addresses you listed. Hopefully, one of those is still active and you can reply to show that you received it. But there are a couple of other issues: (1) What happened to your (...) (24 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.184)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR