To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 7869
7868  |  7870
Subject: 
Re: Reducing fussiness in automated password appraisal
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Sun, 8 Oct 2000 06:16:09 GMT
Viewed: 
394 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
  http://www.lugnet.com/people/members/pwsa2/
Give it a whirl, lemme know what you think.  I think you'll find it's a lot
more lenient.  (I hope it's not too lenient.)

Certainly *way* easier to pass. I'd even suggest using level 3. Level 2
passes "c00l!" (just barely). Would it be possible to kick up the relative
strength of the dictionary check a bit?

I'd say level 2 is too easy.  My current password doesn't fail until level 8.
And one I'm playing with, trying to get the pattern down in my head and with
my fingers, gets an outstanding even at level 12.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Reducing fussiness in automated password appraisal
 
(...) Certainly *way* easier to pass. I'd even suggest using level 3. Level 2 passes "c00l!" (just barely). Would it be possible to kick up the relative strength of the dictionary check a bit? (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

4 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR