 | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Tim Courtney
|
| | | "William R Ward" <bill@wards.net> wrote in message news:m2ofktbfq0.fsf_...rds.net... (...) I think he should be repirmanded as well - only for swearing though. His response was very distasteful and out of line, though I don't think he can or should (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | (...) Really? What if I were to use the "N" word? It's just an opinion, right? I'm sure racist or religious slurs wouldn't go over well, and likewise, neither should slurs about someone's sexual orientation. It's all hate speech. ~Grand Admiral (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | "Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:sandlin-2012012...ink.com... (...) His (...) can (...) opinion (...) So you can justify punishing someone for an opinion? I wouldn't approve of any racial slur being used, but that doesn't (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I think there's a fine line here and IIRC the ToS is deliberately ambiguous on it. users are enjoined (by the discussion group terms) as follows: " 4. (do not) Post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Only for expressing the opinion, I think. (...) But then why do you support the mandate against profanity? I've assumed the goal of these rules is to make LUGNET a place where adults can do their thing and still be a place that parents are (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | "Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:Gor26t.98p@lugnet.com... (...) So, do you advocate a 'speech code' system for LUGNET? Careful, read this first: (URL) suggested reading - anything by Larry Elder. Look at it this way. I (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | Tim, I'm choping your note and reassembling because I think it's important... (...) I believe I detect a double standard in your rhetoric. Is it "pinning" something on you to identify the fault in your thinking? (...) For me, this isn't really about (...) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | ="Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:Goszrp.H3J@lugnet.com... (...) important... Ok. (...) though. (...) I don't believe there's a fault in my thinking. I will definitely examine my thinking, but at this point I still (...) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms") —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) While the trend in campus speech codes is disturbing, I don't think universities need to allow complete free speech. Universities need to provide an environment for education. If a person (or group of people) is being abused by the speech of (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
