 | | The Lego Website [was: Re: LEGO... are you out there? Do you care?]
|
|
(...) I'll agree that lego.com isn't terribly interesting. . .the only part I might have been interested in was looking at the Castle stuff, which specifically is not viewable without going through a Flash waste-of-time (which doesn't seem to like (...) (23 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help on Unsubscribing (web site doesn't think I'm subscribed)
|
|
(...) I show you subscribed to lugnet.announce, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.lego.announce, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.starwars and lugnet.trains. Are the groups you are trying to unsubscribe included in this list? If so, I'll (...) (23 years ago, 12-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help on Unsubscribing (web site doesn't think I'm subscribed)
|
|
thanks I tried x-posting after the fact but it said I'd already submitted the topic ! ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com> To: <lugnet.general@lugnet.com>; <lugnet.admin.genera...ugnet.com> Sent: Tuesday, (...) (23 years ago, 12-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help on Unsubscribing (web site doesn't think I'm subscribed)
|
|
(...) x-posted to admin.general for visibility thanks, James (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Admin assistance needed, I think.
|
|
(...) Thanks, James! I was overlooking the obvious...I knew it couldn't be anything difficult. -Dave (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) I agree 100%. Scott A (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Admin assistance needed, I think.
|
|
(...) Redo your posting setup cookie. Go to (URL) re-enter your information with the correct e-mail address. It will update your posting cookie. :) James I'm not an admin, but I've played one on TV. (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Go5DH7.In2@lugnet.com... (...) interface? (...) a (...) I use Outlook Express to read LUGNET as I personally find the web interface painful to use. The verification process is realtively (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Admin assistance needed, I think.
|
|
Hello Admins! I seem to have encountered a small problem with my profile/login. Since the demise of @Home, my email is no longer what is listed at the top of the messages. It should be listed as legomecha@adelphia.net. I've tried logging out and (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) Yea, not so bad as trying to pull up the web view of the message to respond, but still a pain. I hope at some point there will be a page accessible as a logged in member which pulls up all the unverified messages and lets you select which ones (...) (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) Well I'm using Aol 7 for e-mail(which has bugs). And you can't often click an url in an email, you have to copy and paste it, even though I selected the setting that's supposed to let you just cick email urls. Steve (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) I do post via the web interface but I'm not a 'paid-up' member so I can't sign in. (...) (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) Wow, that's even harder than it is for me. I have to send the message, wait for the server responce, click the url and hit yes. A grand total of 2 clicks. Definetly not brain surgery, and no, I don't want verification to go away either. (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) I don't know about that Steven, but this one would rather read in a newsreader. Unfortunately, this means that to start a reply on the web requires going through the process of: Press [H] to display the headers (I'm using Forte Agent). (...) (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) Because those of us who use newsreaders can sort through and view messages WAY faster than we could with the web interface. Unfortunately, the verification stuff throws a monkeywrench in the gears, so I tend to post less frequently than I did (...) (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Member State
|
|
How does one change the State (and Flag) on one's member page? I figured clicking on it might do the trick, but that just takes you to the local group. I fear I may feel dumb if the answer is easy ... but it's a comfortable feeling for me. -s (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
In lugnet.general, Steven Lane writes: <snip> (...) Unforunatly he hasn't gone away, he still post to R.T.L every once in awhile and makes claims that he will be back to LUGNET. So what can you do, it's a hassle but these kind of jerks make lots of (...) (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) well :-(. (...) if it bothers you that much, why don't you just post via the web interface? no verification there? (...) to (...) I doubt that will happen. Dan (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) Yeah but the police don't hassle me for my I.D. EVERY day!! (...) I agree the person(s) was a total jerk. But he's probably gone now anyway. Why not have verification for the month following a strike, then revert to normal. Steve (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) Police stink. It's not like that many people are being robbed. I agree 100% that it's a pain to have to do the verification, but put that blame where it belongs - on the jerk(s) who were abusing all our trust, instead of with the people who (...) (23 years ago, 9-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
