 | | Slowness
|
|
I authorised these on Friday (via e-mail) but they took until last night to appear: (URL) (mail at November 23, 2001 8:04 PM) (URL) (mail at November 23, 2001 7:53 PM) Scott A (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) I've had enough of this petty name-calling, I wish you would all grow up :) Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Duane Hess writes: but it (...) I'll skip it and wait for the movie. I wonder who will be cast as the lead characters? (Maybe they will choose animals? Silly me, the SPCA would have none of that!) -John FUT OT.fun (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) *Ouch* I just went through the most horrible part of LUGNET. I missed this whole part because of the nice filters on news.lugnet.com I stand corrected and will try to read everything before I answer to a post. The only reason I came across (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) All too obvious. I was actually reading admin.general to catch up on general administration items that happend over the Thanksgiving holiday, but it feels more like I'm reading a biography of an elementary school hall monitor.... -Duane (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) Mark - read lugnet.admin.general around this post. It should be obvious. Jason J Railton (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) First of all: Suz, I respect you and your role as LUGNET Admin. But I have to ask: what do you mean with this? I mean, we all play with LEGO, so growing up is part of the not-done thingy. Seriuosly though: what do you mean? Mark de Kock (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever
|
|
I'm not going to bicker with you in the group. I'll discuss facts. But there is nothing to be gained by addressing the tosh below in this group. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling for banishment?
|
|
I'm not going to bicker with you in the group. I'll discuss facts. But there is nothing to be gained by addressing the garbage below. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Scott and Larry Show: Call for a Series Finale
|
|
in article GnEx5o.DL7@lugnet.com, Scott A at eh105jb@mx1.pair.com wrote on 11/26/01 8:49 AM: (...) Yes. If they are spurious, they will speak for themselves. If you REALLY feel you have been harmed, then get a lawyer and sue for slander, or libel, (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever
|
|
in article GnFpB6.6pB@lugnet.com, Larry Pieniazek at lpieniazek@mercator.com wrote on 11/26/01 6:57 PM: (...) Thus spake the Marvel comics villain. (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GnFpB6.6pB@lugnet.com... (...) care, (...) not (...) Well, at least 17 people have approved. As for the rest of the people here? We will never know. Note, there's no longer a way of (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever
|
|
Larry: I think that you are seeing your own role in this in too positive a light, I even perceive that you are trying to dress up your contest with Scott as somehow heroic on behalf of the greater community on your part. It just ain't so -- at least (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Whatever
|
|
(...) Yes, but do they care enough to do what needs to be done? And if they care, is that thing a doable thing just because they care? I don't think so. Any call for a penalty for anyone is just whistling in the wind because it's not the community (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Scott and Larry Show: Call for a Series Finale
|
|
"Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:GnEx5o.DL7@lugnet.com... (...) I had already read that thread, and I've developed the opinion that both of you were at fault. In the spirit of letting -that- debate die, I won't elaborate (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: edventures spam
|
|
(...) Lugnet isn't spam free, although I *think* it's set up to discourage robots and other automated creepy crawlies. Anyone harvesting from Lugnet would have to at least subscribe, and grab the e-mail addys from message headers. This takes out a (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: edventures spam
|
|
(...) Thanks Dan and Jenn, No big deal overall (to me at least), although I must have dreamed that LUGNET was spam free. -chris (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Grow up.
|
|
Look: I don't care what your opinions are and I'm not going to baby-sit. So just knock it off, and/or go away. You all know who you are. Suzanne Rich LUGNET Admin (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: The Scott and Larry Show: Call for a Series Finale
|
|
(...) Check the posting times. Do you seriously think I should let Larry level all sort of spurious allegations against me? Really? (...) I have not read them all. But I have not been the only culprit here. Read the thread which started this up to (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | The Scott and Larry Show: Call for a Series Finale
|
|
Admins, please, this has to stop. Despite the expressions of disgust over Scott and Larry's mudslinging from many Lugnetters, they continue it with no regard. Just today Scott posts 9 more responses to Larry's posts, all in a short period of time. (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
