 | | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) Duane, Thanks for pointing out exactly where I was going with my argument. He screwed up and got shot down for the language abuse. We can remember the lesson, move on, and all be better for it. -Dave (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Then you'd be wrong. -Dave (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) WOOHOO!!!! Not THAT would be a useful item here at LUGNET. Far better than Brickshelf's instructions database that is updated through 1997. Knowing what parts are in sets helps me decide what to buy and I know I'm not the only one who uses (...) (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
We're also very happy to be on the team, and are very excited to be here. I hope y'all will be patient with us, since it will take a while to understand the code for LUGNET, which is a huge project. :) Dan (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Well, I'd rather not speak for Steve, but I can point you in some directions about him, specifically: (URL) for Dan and myself, let's see... We've been DB admins for the LUGNET Guide since June of 2000, we run (URL) (including the peeron inventories (...) (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Congrats on the new positions. eric (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Welcome and congrats. For some of us folks who are a little rusty on our LUGNET history, maybe introductions/backgrounds from Steve, Dan, and Jennifer might be nice... what do you say, guys? Again, congrats! - Steve (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
I think that's on a to-do list somewhere. :) Jennifer (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) I think that there is a distinction, however small, between JAL's post and Matt's post. I don't want to get in to that though - I don't feel that it's constructive. The thing about Matt's post that I find offensive is the subject line. A (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) The good news is you're not bitter about it. :-) Why don't we move on... Jude (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Does this mean we may see links to Peeron inventories in the Lugnet Database in the near future? :) (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) It's hard to respond to a fortune cookie, but if you mean that this path leads away from past mistakes, I have a question for you: Is Jesse Alan Long still banned? I would love to hear that his posting ability was re-instated, and that Lugnet (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) I'm going to go out on a limb and guess you didn't bother to actually read the thread I pointed to. eric (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Alright, I didn't want to jump into this one to continue a thread with a seemingly offensive title (which is worse than strting it, IMHO), but this is a bit much. Frustration over what Matt thought he saw happening was perfectly justified. I (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) My path leads forward. Please don't trip me. -Suzanne Rich LUGNET Admin (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Perhaps, then, it is time to ban him. A little refresher reading for everyone: (URL) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Words are less important than the way in which they are used: "...LEGO sucks for bending over and letting the Maori ream them like this..." isn't particularly nice language. And not "giving a rat's @$$" about a culture isn't very nice either. (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) I (...) now (...) standard (...) argue (...) the (...) unfortunatly, creating a "standard" like that is a very hard (if not impossible) thing to do. For instance, saying "This set is crap" is very very different (at least in my mind) from (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Suz, May I commend you on a terrific decision. Dan actually already contacted me to get the LUGMAP updated which was a long time in comming and its already done!! You could not have picked 3 more upstanding members of the community! I look forward (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:200110311220.f9...ron.com... (...) My concern in this paragraph is some inconsistency I'm perceiving. Where I recall her not being concerned about this [particular word] before, but now it appears (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
