To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 8585 (-10)
  Re: Uselessness of .debate
 
(...) Well, I'm writing this on December 25th in a hotel room before we go spend the day with family and I don't take what Larry said as a snipe on Christianity. The celebration of the Winter Solstice predates the celebration of Christmas by a good (...) (25 years ago, 25-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Uselessness of .debate
 
(...) What Larry said. Just that the two of you opt to keep .debate around. Chris (25 years ago, 24-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: This is weird.(about .debate)
 
(...) I started the thred in both .debate and .admin.general because I felt there was an issue with how Lugnet is run, and the effect .debate has on the whole of Lugnet. Perhaps it wasn't the right thing to do, it certainly did grow beyond what is (...) (25 years ago, 24-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  This is weird.(about .debate)
 
Hi, Why are you guys debating the uselessness of .debate in the admin.general group? I would think you would do this in .debate. Anyway I thought it was kinda funny. Cheers! Gary (25 years ago, 24-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Uselessness of .debate
 
(...) Well, for my own part, I think the debate has turned a corner. Perhaps we've convinced Larry and Scott A to back off a bit, and I think the current dicsussion is actually bringing up some interesting points, and doesn't seem as much to be (...) (25 years ago, 24-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Uselessness of .debate
 
(...) Ah, Larry, always throwing a few snipes in to Christianity, huh? I expected nothing less, that's all right. (...) Folks, all I responded to was Frank Filz (SP?) discussion about debate, and according to what he thought, I agreed with him. I (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Uselessness of .debate
 
(...) The way it's written one could almost read it as he hopes that you two have a lot of fights with each other, rather a mean thing to wish so close to Winter Solstice festival, don't you think? :-) So I'm doubting *that* is what he meant. (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Uselessness of .debate
 
(...) About what? --Todd (25 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Uselessness of .debate
 
(...) Can the two of you please take all of this offline to private email? --Todd (25 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Debate's current problem (was Re: Uselessness of .debate)
 
(...) I read your other post, and you made some groovy assertions. I suppose I'm as guilty of "point-scoring" as anyone else, but I wasn't consciously doing it to amass points. Sometimes it seems to me simply polite to address each point in turn, (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR