 | | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) Hmm. I suppose it depends on what you mean by average. I assume you are just rating myself, and others, against your own above average intellect? Perception of intellect is an area which always exasperates me. I find that people mix these (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) Well, I can tell you my perception has changed since I accidently fell into a debate recently. You know those people who have an inner smugness from the knowledge that in any given gathering of people they are generally smarter than just about (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Private boards?
|
|
(...) Gah. Don't you have a day job now, besides correcting me? :D eric (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Private boards?
|
|
(...) (d'Oh!) LUGNET is not an NNTP server. LUGNET is the international network of user-groups of LEGO products. For the benefit of LEGO users and user-groups worldwide, LUGNET runs an NNTP server on lugnet.com for NNTP news/discussion groups, an (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Private boards?
|
|
(...) D'oh, right. I tend to forget that Lugnet is really a NNTP server, since I use the web connection. eric (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Membership Packets
|
|
(...) Todd, Thank you for personally responding. I am glad to hear that the membership packets are indeed still being distributed. I can only imagine the amount of time this must consume. Thank you for your continued efforts. Sincerely, Ken Wright (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Contribution Idea? (Was: Re: Membership Packets)
|
|
(...) Maybe it would be too much overshoot for the job, but last week some computer company send me an advert. It featured a special laser printer, with he size of an HP 2100, having three separate magazines for advert brochures/cards, letter (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) No! I disagree! Etc etc. :) Darned UUs! Any forum is only as good as its practitioners. Since LUGNET went 'live' I've operated with the assumption that .debate matters stay in .debate, and expect others to do the same--I've only once seen what (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Leakage from .debate
|
|
(...) No, it's a good point. I was wondering about that myself. I, of course, would like to think I'm nifty! enough that I don't let how things go in one group influence how they go in another, and especially not to the point of lambasting a (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Leakage from .debate
|
|
I don't want to drag another thread into the discussion about .debate, but in the following post: (URL) says: (...) Larry - I'm curious, do you feel that your response to Christopher may have been more harsh than it may have deserved to be, perhaps (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) I would like to see .debate be able to exist as something worthwhile, but I sense that with each debate which explodes into a ravaging god vs science debate, we lose another of the folks who are interested in serious debate. I'm not sure how (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) Oops. My bad. I should have caught that, but as you say, I was away for what has got to be one of the biggest weeks on l.o-t.d and was racing to mow through hundreds of posts. At this point I'm overwhelmed and haven't even looked at the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) Some thoughts: - I've wondered if .debate should have a no-crossposting rule, except for crossposting in (which can easily be checked, for a post to be accepted which is cross-posted in .debate and any other group, it must be a followup to a (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) It leaked over here when a .debate novice set FUT incorrectly to point here just because something funny was said. I set the FUT back in my reply, but of course, once ONE post appears in a group, you always run the risk of latecomers missing (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Contribution Idea? (Was: Re: Membership Packets)
|
|
(...) It's not possible, no. Security and privacy issues as well as technical logistics. What I need to do to break the bottleneck is change the way I print cards. Most of the steps of the other stuff are automated but there is a manual step with (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Lugnet Contribution Idea? (Was: Re: Membership Packets)
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G4zvoG.A4G@lugnet.com... (...) members? (...) Todd, Since it seems that the packets are behind often - what about opening up the task for members to do as a part of their donation to Lugnet? (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Membership Packets
|
|
(...) Good question. Yes. Unfortunately, we're behind on printing and mailing. On the other hand, they're only a formality rather than a prerequisite to interaction. I appreciate your patience. --Todd (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Membership Packets
|
|
I was wondering: Are membership packets still being distributed to all paid LUGNET members? I know this was being done when the first 100 or so members signed up, and it included (from what I read) some pretty neat things. Since only a few people (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | migrate private set list to public list
|
|
Is there any easy way to migrate my private set list information in my membership webpage to the public list. I added it all as private (use to privacy on the NET) without thinking clearly about it :) Todd or whomever maintains the web forms, I (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Private boards?
|
|
(...) I think it was a technical issue. NNTP groups aren't easy to make private without password-protecting connections, etc. --Todd (25 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
