Subject:
|
Re: Leakage from .debate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:15:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2804 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Frank Filz writes:
> I don't want to drag another thread into the discussion about .debate,
> but in the following post:
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/market/theory/?n=1795
>
> Larry says:
>
> > I'm sorry for dragging your employer in where not appropriate, then laying
> > the sarcasm on a bit thick... that wasn't nice. My apologies.
>
> Larry - I'm curious, do you feel that your response to Christopher may
> have been more harsh than it may have deserved to be, perhaps was
> influenced at all by the frustration of the "debate" in .debate? In my
> last post in .admin, I brought up the possibility of leakage out of
> .debate, could this be an example?
>
> Just a thought, and feel free to ignore or blast me if my opinion is
> horribly off target
No, it's a good point. I was wondering about that myself.
I, of course, would like to think I'm nifty! enough that I don't let how
things go in one group influence how they go in another, and especially not
to the point of lambasting a recently decloaked lurker... but perhaps I have
feet of clay after all?
We have touched on this in the past, how vitriol can leak, and how ill
feelings can be carried over, and I guess had I snapped at Bill Farkas it
might have been more defensible. (??) But I think what made it worse is that
I managed to be quite civil to Bill Farkas in the thread about the letter to
Lego, while snapping at an unrelated bystander in a different one.
Ok, no, it's not really more defensible to have snapped at Bill either.
In hindsight, I came down WAY too hard on Christopher and I am not going to
stand behind any "but the devil/.debate made me do it" defense, it was just
unacceptable...
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Leakage from .debate
|
| I don't want to drag another thread into the discussion about .debate, but in the following post: (URL) says: (...) Larry - I'm curious, do you feel that your response to Christopher may have been more harsh than it may have deserved to be, perhaps (...) (26 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
