| |
Eric Harshbarger wrote:
> I'm flexible. I'm fine with the structure now. If a .sculpture subgroup
> were added I would probably still post to .general .build and
> .build.sculpture (with follow-up to .sculpture).
>
> There are certainly issues with building that are unique to large
> sculptures (distortion, modularity, weigh, etc)... ut I'm not sure that
> they warrant a separate group.
>
> In other words,I'll let it be you're call, and I'm sure I'll be happy
> either way.
>
> .build is currently one of the half dozen or so groups I do read
> reularly.
As a minor player in the sculpture arena, I echo all of Eric's
comments quoted above.
Andrew
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
