|
In lugnet.admin.general, Eric Kingsley writes:
> Just a thought because of all the great Sculpture's that have been showing
> up lately from Eric H. and Henry L. and others. It seems worthy to me
> although I don't know about how others feel about further
> compartmentalization.
>
> I love the stuff and would like a good one step place to look to find more
> info just in case I decide to try my hand at sculpting in the future.
EricH, HenryL, etc. -- what do you think? Would this help or would this
contribute to unneeded fragmentation? Do you read .build reguarly? If not,
would you read a .build.sculpture regularly?
I think it's a great idea, but only if the advantages outweigh the
disadvantages. The current .build group certainly isn't high-traffic, but
its .mecha subgroup has proven quite useful.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Is it time for lugnet.build.sculpture ?
|
| Just a thought because of all the great Sculpture's that have been showing up lately from Eric H. and Henry L. and others. It seems worthy to me although I don't know about how others feel about further compartmentalization. I love the stuff and (...) (24 years ago, 22-Nov-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|