Subject:
|
Re: Is it time for lugnet.build.sculpture ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 17:57:05 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
eric@ericharshbarger.ANTISPAMorg
|
Viewed:
|
501 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> EricH, HenryL, etc. -- what do you think? Would this help or would this
> contribute to unneeded fragmentation? Do you read .build reguarly? If not,
> would you read a .build.sculpture regularly?
>
> I think it's a great idea, but only if the advantages outweigh the
> disadvantages. The current .build group certainly isn't high-traffic, but
> its .mecha subgroup has proven quite useful.
>
> --Todd
Todd,
I'm flexible. I'm fine with the structure now. If a .sculpture subgroup
were added I would probably still post to .general .build and
.build.sculpture (with follow-up to .sculpture).
There are certainly issues with building that are unique to large
sculptures (distortion, modularity, weigh, etc)... ut I'm not sure that
they warrant a separate group.
In other words,I'll let it be you're call, and I'm sure I'll be happy
either way.
.build is currently one of the half dozen or so groups I do read
reularly.
eric
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Harshbarger / eric@ericharshbarger.org / www.ericharshbarger.org
"Oh please, if people are going to start telling the truth around
here... I'm going to bed." - Jackie-O (Parker Posey, THE HOUSE OF YES)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
