 | | Re: Lugnet Membership - Idea !!!
|
|
Hi ! (...) l.o-t.debate) (...) Were there souch a debates in the past ? I guess that all the lugnet members (and those who'd become members in future) are nice people .... (...) ... I guess that would mean whole new newsgroup I don't know it Todd (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Membership - Idea !!!
|
|
(...) There all very nice in person (I'm sure) but they can get nasty sometimes when defending their beliefs (or otherwise just flaming). Yes, there have been such debates. It still stings sometimes to think back to those, even to me (I usually try (...) (24 years ago, 13-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Membership - Idea !!!
|
|
(...) Hi! (...) You betcha. I can remember a few particularly nasty ones, and I know people can often be irrational when it comes to things like that.... (...) Well, not a newsgroup per se, but a registration system. Take a look at the new set (...) (24 years ago, 13-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Membership - Idea !!!
|
|
Hi ! (...) people >can often be irrational when it comes to things like that.... People , people , people ... Yeah - two is enough - even to start wars ! (...) the >new set guide. Yup, seen it ! Great thing (I already helped two guys to sell/buy (...) (24 years ago, 13-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Membership - Idea !!!
|
|
(...) How about "seller turn around time" or "seller response time" (which could actually judge the overall seller response time, both in responding to the initial request to buy and in getting the package into the mail once payment is received. Low (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.theory)
|
