 | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G20t6H.4us@lugnet.com... (...) news:G1zGDI.4Iy@lugnet.com... (...) is (...) addresses (...) show (...) membership (...) I, too, am wondering that <g>... (...) That was inside the membership (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
(...) OK, that helps. I'll have the server send an e-mail to each of the addresses you listed. Hopefully, one of those is still active and you can reply to show that you received it. But there are a couple of other issues: (1) What happened to your (...) (26 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
DBR <assman@finalfrontier.com> wrote in message news:G1zGDI.4Iy@lugnet.com... (...) address (...) member (...) you're (...) (Generally I do write words in my messages, sorry) Dylan (Bradley) Reardon: Member no. 253 -- "To infinity and beyond!" (26 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G1zDMo.MIK@lugnet.com... (...) password, (...) I (...) have (...) confusion. (...) ID (...) three (...) (26 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
(...) Hmm, wait, now I'm confused. I don't see you listed. What is your member ID number? Anyway, by primary email I meant the first one of the (up to) three that you gave when you signed up to be a member. But I think maybe you're confusing (...) (26 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G1EAr4.F49@lugnet.com... (...) stuff, (...) primary (...) send (...) one (...) Oh, hi Todd. I should have checked this NG before emailing you... Anyway, I emailed you about <thinking> 5 (?) (...) (26 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LCad Parts Update 2000-02 Now Available
|
|
(...) I'm working on it as I type. Neat trick, eh? Whoops, gotta go. It just finished a process. Steve (26 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Reducing fussiness in automated password appraisal
|
|
(...) I found a big difference too. I have 4 or 5 passwords I use for my "non-critical" logins, and on the old system (lvl 2) they got a mixture of good & weak. On the new system they all get great on lvl 2 and good on lvl 3, so I agree, maybe lvl 3 (...) (26 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: dead links
|
|
(...) Jeremy Sproat and a couple others were working on it a while back and made quite a bit of progress -- check the .faq group archives for old discussions -- but I think due to time considerations it has stagnated. One thing I'd like to see in a (...) (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: dead links
|
|
(...) Ah yes, thanks, (another loose-ends casualty of the news move of the summer -- they were using server-relative URLs)... Fixed now. Thanks again. --Todd (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO SET GUIDE - The Big Picture ?
|
|
(...) No and Yes. No, the code/feature is the same -- it has always (since the new set guide went up a few weeks ago) displayed the "larger" (where available) image when you click the medium-size image. Yes, the 6990 image changed yesterday -- I (...) (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: dead links
|
|
I've been thinking about this as well. And I will volunteer my time toward creating either the database or the traditional faq. As it is, I often search the newsgroups for past answers and it is often fruitless, even when the information I seek is (...) (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: dead links
|
|
This brings up a question of mine, which there might be an answer for but I am not clear on. Will there ever be a 'LUGNET FAQ' encompassing all of these?? Is there someone or some group of people working on assembling data for that? I'd certainly (...) (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | dead links
|
|
These links rec.toys.lego (RTL) FAQ and Auction & Shipping FAQ on this page (URL) to be dead. Scott A (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LCad Parts Update 2000-02 Now Available
|
|
(...) Now that the update is available, will the parts reference on lugnet updated as well? The web reference is a really nice feature ;-) Regards, Hakan (...) (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO SET GUIDE - The Big Picture ?
|
|
(...) Is this new? I'm pretty sure that when I looked at this the other day both the big and small images linked to the same file - the smaller one was only shrunk. I am also 100% sure that the 6990 image changed since yesterday. Scott A (...) etc.) (...) (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO SET GUIDE - The Big Picture ?
|
|
(...) Hey, even a stopped clock is right 2 times a day (only once if you're in the military, there's a moral there somewhere...) Scott's right more often than you think, Shiri. I just usually think he could phrase stuff more smoothly, that's all. If (...) (26 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO SET GUIDE - The Big Picture ?
|
|
(...) Ya, I'm not bothered by it either, and the medium-sized default images aren't necessarily always smaller (most of the time they are, but not always -- it depends on the size of the originating scan). A smaller initial image makes for much (...) (26 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Reducing fussiness in automated password appraisal
|
|
(...) Certainly *way* easier to pass. I'd even suggest using level 3. Level 2 passes "c00l!" (just barely). Would it be possible to kick up the relative strength of the dictionary check a bit? (26 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO SET GUIDE - The Big Picture ?
|
|
Actually, Scott, clicking on this: (...) (URL) clicked on "open link in new window" to find out what the link was, BTW). Maybe Todd just found the time to fix it. ;-) (...) Seems like history was made - Scott and Larry aren't disagreeing, if not (...) (26 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
