 | | Re: defining proper content —Matthew Miller
|
| | | (...) I'm sorry; I didn't mean to give you a case in point. However, I do disagree with you. Rather than saying that we should be nicer to younger people, I think it'd be better for everyone to be more civil in general. People *do* have the ability (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: defining proper content —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn8pj4h5.nhe.....bu.edu... (...) to (...) Understood, its ok. (...) nicer (...) I'd agree with you wholeheartedly. I just think that this might be good for improved communication. But yes, (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Lugnet tensions? (was Re: defining proper content) —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | (...) Help me out here- I've been seeing a lot of people talking about an "increased level of tension" on Lugnet lately, but I guess I don't see it. I know there were two very controversial threads in the past week/week-and-a-half... namely, the (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: defining proper content —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | (...) in (...) for (...) I have found that since I have stopped going into off.topic.debate, I am a lot calmer, and seem to relax a lot more. : ) I think healthy discussion is fine, especially since the brick is a good chunk of life, but I try to (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: defining proper content —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | "Scott E. Sanburn" <ssanburn@cleanweb.net> wrote in message news:010e01c006fd$12...8d0@SES... (...) civil (...) isn't (...) a (...) Yeah. I did that about a year and a half ago and it made a difference. Though o-t.debate is somehwat necessary, I (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: defining proper content —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | | (...) am (...) It is very distructive, and I found that I was thinking about it all the time, and I decided to drop it. It is a healthy move, IMO. I rather discuss LEGO items more than anything. (...) but (...) won't (...) age (...) its (...) Yes, (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: defining proper content —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Heh. Meeee toooo. (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
